Laserfiche WebLink
<br />&- /,Z <br /> <br />Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />............................................................... <br />AB 1295 (Bermudez). Fireworks. Sale. <br />Disposal. AB 1295 seeks to expand the sale of <br />fireworks for one week each year pursuant to a <br />AB 260 (Bermudez). State Fire Marshal. license issued by the State Fire Marshal, if autho- <br />Fire Response Time. Reports. As amended on rized by a city or county. Addit!onally, AB 1295 <br />April 13, 2005, AB 260 would compare fire tR!part- establishes the State Fire Marshal Dangerous <br />ment fire suppression incident reports to a nation- . Fireworks Management Fund for the purpose of <br />ally recognized fire protection standard relative to covering the disposal costs associated with any <br />NFPA 1710 - a voluntary standard produced by the fireworks seized. <br />National Fire Protection Association. . <br />However, earlier this week, the author proposed The League agrees that a reliable revenue <br />amendments to the bill to strike reference to a source for enforcement and disposal of fireworks is <br />comparison of fire department data t.o the contro- " needed: However, extending the sale of fireworks <br />versial NFPA 1710 standard, w~ich is oppose<! qy '. .for"one week a year is a public safety concern for <br />most local ju'!..sdictib!,~'~n" <?~I,ifórn(a" . '. , .,. ,cities throughout California. Staff: Uisa Lawson <br />. '"" " : .,' ". ~ :%~,,> St~rk;, Status: failed Passage in AsApps, 5-25-05; <br />The League's original position on t.heb,II~~s' .P0sition: Oppose ~nless Amended. <br />"oppose unless amended' tq rem.l;>ve any refer~ncß" '. . <br />to a comparison of fire depàrthlenf 'data to: a stão~- . ", AC~ 16' (Gordon). Taxation to Supplement <br />dard interpreted as NPPA 171'0. . After meeting with' Public Safety Funding. Approval by Elector- <br />the author, and taking in to consideration the ate. ACA 16 would allow a locãl government to <br />proposed amendments (which addressed our impose/extend, or increase any special tax for the <br />concerns with comparison to NFPA 1710), the purpose of providing supplemental funding for <br />League took a neutral position on the bill. sheriff, police, or fire protection services. Specifi- <br />cally, ACA 16 would allow local governments to <br />impose a special tax if approved by 55 percent of <br />. voters, instead of the two-thirds margin currently <br />required by the California Constitution. <br /> <br />PUBLIC SAFETY <br /> <br />While local officials understand the value in <br />making fire department data available, the Assem- <br />bly Appropriations Committee was aware that it <br />could be anticipated that local jurisdictions would <br />seek reimbursement from the state for complying <br />with the requirements in the bill. <br /> <br />AS 260 failed passage in the Assembly Appro- <br />priations Committee on May 25, 2005, due to <br />estimat.ed costs ofthemandaie requirements in the <br />bill, which include: <br /> <br />Significant state-reimbursable on going <br />costs to local fire departments of almost $7 million <br />for increased reporting requirements. ,. <br />Significant on-going costs of $540,000 from <br />the General Fund to the California Department of <br />Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) and $144,000 <br />from the General Fund to the St~te Fire Marshal for <br />staff to compile, analy;æ, and publish data. Staff: <br />. Liisa Lawson Stark; Status: ' Failed Passage in <br />AsApps, 5-25-O5;.Position: Neutral. <br /> <br />,- - . <br /> <br />ACA 16 takes a positive step towards providing <br />local governments with the authority they need to <br />provide a level of public safety service that commu- <br />nities require and allows cities to raise revenues <br />cQnsisteilt with local priorities. ~t2ff: Lii~a <br />Lawson Stark; Status: AsmFlr; Position: Sup- <br />port. <br /> <br />PAGE 12/PRIORITV FOCUS <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Siteuwww.cacities.org <br />