My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-10-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-10-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2017 8:33:20 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 3:26:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/23/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Marijuana: Results of a Public Opinion Survey in San Mateo County <br /> © 2016 BRIGHT RESEARCH GROUP | 10 <br /> <br />and the county with an opportunity to enforce purchasing age limits, signage, taxation and other <br />restrictions on tobacco sales. If recreational marijuana becomes legal, public support for these <br />policies creates an opportunity for local jurisdictions to expand their tobacco-‐retail-‐license <br />policies to include marijuana. The respondents were also highly supportive (67 percent) of <br />policies that would forbid stores within 1,000 feet of youth spaces (e.g., schools and parks) from <br />selling marijuana. Half of the respondents said they would disapprove if a marijuana store were <br />to open in their neighborhoods, and 58 percent said they would disapprove if marijuana <br />advertisements were to appear in their communities. <br /> <br />Access and Use Policies: The growth of marijuana for recreational use and secondhand exposure <br />to marijuana smoke may become more common, now that Prop. 64 has passed. A majority (62 <br />percent) of respondents said they would disapprove if marijuana were grown in their neighbors’ <br />front yards; however, 58 percent said they would approve of backyard cultivation. A majority of <br />respondents (61 percent) said they would disapprove of marijuana being used in public spaces. <br />This data suggests that public support may exist for expanding local policies on smoking in public <br />spaces, restaurants and bars, at events, and in other spaces to apply to marijuana products. <br />While public support may exist for regulating marijuana cultivation on private property, there is a <br />lack of support for restricting people from using marijuana in their own homes (72 percent). <br />Additional data may be needed to understand public support for restricting marijuana use in <br />multi-‐unit housing complexes, where secondhand smoke can waft between units. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br />Positive social norms around marijuana are commonplace in California and its local communities. <br />The recent legalization of recreational marijuana in California under Proposition 64 raises <br />concerns about the potential for the increasing use or abuse of the substance by youth and <br />adults. The San Mateo County BHRS launched a public opinion survey campaign to capture <br />baseline data on residents’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding marijuana access and <br />use before voters approved Proposition 64. By utilizing community-‐based organizations, the <br />county was able to access the public opinions of over 4,200 residents. This valuable data <br />provides the county with information about its residents’ priorities and concerns about <br />marijuana’s influence in their communities. Equipped with the knowledge of public opinion, the <br />county can develop public-‐education campaigns and policy efforts that are responsive to its <br />communities and the constituents of its local policymakers. The county could consider reissuing <br />this survey after recreational-‐marijuana legalization is implemented to understand whether <br />residents’ attitudes have changed. This unique strategy is an opportunity for jurisdictions across <br />the country to develop public health and harm-‐reduction strategies that are community <br />supported. <br />8.A. - Page 85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.