Laserfiche WebLink
signals or ti�affic control devices. Language prohibiting such signage was incorporated�/`"�- <br /> in the recommendation by the Planning Commission to the City Council. Due to an <br /> editing error in Section 3.114.b, the ordinance adopted by the City Council reads as <br /> � permissive for signs in these locations. The•attached ordinance revisions correct the <br /> error and reinstates language to make such signage illegaL <br /> Other amendments to Section 3.114 provide clarity in the ordinance, and thus to <br /> enforcement staff, regarding placement of signs in the public right-of-way. These <br /> changes more clearly define the visibility triangle and the parking strip. <br /> 3) Next Steps <br /> In June, the City Council sent back to the Architectural Review Committee and the <br /> Planning Commission, two issues for reconsideration. They were asked to: a) review <br /> the proposed Freeway Overlay Zone for possible expansion to the length of Hwy 101 <br /> within the City limits, and b) develop alternative language for exceptions to Prohibited <br /> Signs, particularly animated signs. The Architectural Review Committee has completed <br /> their work. The Planning Commission will take up the issue, pending a property owners <br /> request to meet with the City Attomey. (The property owner has delayed this meeting, <br /> and it is currently scheduled for December 9, 1999). Once the Planning Commission <br /> considers the issues, recommendations will be brought back to the City Council as a <br /> separate item after the first of the year. - <br /> Additional amendments may also be necessary to assist enforcement of the City <br /> Council intent regarding the sign ordinance. These would also be brought back to the <br /> City Council after the first of the year. <br /> Alternative <br /> Do not adopt these amendments at this time and wait for the comprehensive revision in _ <br /> January. This alternative would delay effective implementation of the ordinance. <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> The fiscal impact of approving these amendments is related to staff time in Code <br /> Enforcement to implement the sign ordinance. There is no additional cost to the City. <br /> J 5.(� ���� <br /> Deborah Nelson d Everett <br /> Community Development City Manager <br /> Director <br /> Attachment <br /> Ordinance <br /> __ ,_ ._.___. <br />