Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Office of City Attorney <br /> <br />í!8 <br />Redwood <br />O-II¥ California <br />loUßlIBtIlBBl <br />~.'.'..'.... ..... <br />~ <br /> <br />33-17 <br /> <br />702 Marshall Street, Ste 314 <br />~Redwood City, CA 94063 <br />(650) 780-7200 <br /> <br />January 26, 2000 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Metropolitan Transportation Commission <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />City of Redwood City <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Eligibility for Surface Transportation Program (STP) or <br />CongestionMitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program- <br />(CMAQ) funds <br /> <br />" 0 ..' <br />. '3. <br />" - <br /> <br />This communication will serve as the requisite opinion of Counsel in connection <br />with the application of the City of Redwood City for funding made available <br />pursuantto 23 U.S.C. Section 133 and 23 U.S.C. Section 149. <br /> <br />1. The City of Redwood City is an eligible sponsor of projects for STP/CMAQ <br />funding. <br /> <br />2. The City of Redwood City is authorized to submit an application for <br />STP/CMAQ funding for the Construction of Rubberized Railroad <br />Crossings in he Cities of Burlingame and San Mateo. These crossings <br />include Broadway, Howard Avenue, Oak Grove, Peninsula Avenue (City <br />of Burlingame), and 25th Avenue (City of San Mateo). <br /> <br />3. I have reviewed the pertinent state laws and I am of the opinion that there <br />is no legal impediment to the City of Redwood City making applications for <br />STP/CMAQ funds. Furthermore, as a result of my examinations,.1 find <br />that there is no pending or threatened litigation, which might in any way <br />adversely affect the proposed projects, or the ability of the City of <br />Redwood City to carry out such projects. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br /> <br />David E. Schricker <br />Print Name <br /> <br />.,..-.-. ..'--r <br />