Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3\\3 <br /> <br />Proposition 12 Fiscal Impacts <br /> <br />The California Taxpayers' Association (Cal-Tax) supports Proposition 12, the Parks, Water, and <br />Coastal Protection Bond Act on the March 7, 2000 ballot. This bond would provide $2.1 billion in <br />funding for needed improvements to local and state parks and conservation projects. Cal-Tax <br />endorses Proposition 12 because it is fiscally responsible, it does not raise taxes, and it pays for <br />projects that are important for all Californians. <br /> <br />Parks are an important component of California's quality of life. Eleven years have passed since the <br />last state bond funds were approved for park improvements. State general obligation bonds like <br />Proposition 12 do not cause a tax increase. Payments on the bond will be made over 20 to 25 <br />years from existing revenues in the state general fund. The passage of a bond merely commits <br />the Legislature to make these bond payments one of their highest budget priorities as they <br />allocate funds. Proposition 12 will require about $140 million a year in debt payments - this is <br />about 0.2 percent of next year's projected general fund budget. This small fraction is a reasonable <br />amount to pay for investing in important facilities that will benefit future generations. It is <br />important that California fund these types of projects while the economy and the state budget are <br />strong. <br /> <br />The Cal-Tax Board of Directors evaluates each bond proposal and takes a position based on the <br />following criteria: <br /> <br />Bonds are an appropriate financing tool under the following circumstances: <br /> <br />. The project to be financed is a capital facility or infrastructure project and the bond funding will <br />pay for land acquisition and capital costs, not for maintenance, operations, non-construction <br />salaries or wages, or ongoing costs. <br /> <br />. Non-bond financing is not a reasonable option. <br /> <br />. The project costs are appropriately shared by future taxpayers because the project will have a <br />useful life at least as long as the term of the bonds and future taxpayers will benefit from the <br />facility that is built with the bond proceeds. <br /> <br />. It is not appropriate for bond funds to pay for equipment, computers, or similar items that will <br />not be useful for at least as long as the debt is outstanding. <br /> <br />. For state bonds, projects funded must be of state-level concern and importance. State bonds <br />should not pay for local projects that do not have significant extra-territorial impact. <br /> <br />. Interest rates for indebtedness are not abnormally high and the overall state debt level will not <br />be excessive. <br /> <br />California Taxpayers' Association is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting <br />taxpayers from unnecessary taxes and promoting efficient, quality government services. <br /> <br />Source: http://www.safeparks.org/financialjcaltax12.html <br /> <br />.. .'~"----..-'T ... <br />