Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~.3 ~ <br /> <br />EVALUATION CRITERIA <br />SAN FRANCISCO BAY ACCESS PROJECTS <br /> <br />PROPOSAL NAME: <br /> <br />PROJECT: Would it provide new access? Does it close a gap? Would it be well used? If <br />it's a planning effort, is it necessary? Does it focus on real issues? Is the scope of work <br />clear? . <br /> <br />CEQA: Is CEQA completed? Ifnot, will it be completed in time? <br /> <br />COST SHARE: Are they picking up a reasonable share? <br /> <br />BUDGET: Are costs realistic? <br /> <br />SCHEDULE: Is the proposed schedule realistic? <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY RANKING: Good, need more info before full evaluation can be done, <br />or poor. . <br /> <br />FOLLOW UP: Who will make the follow up call? <br /> <br />III-21 <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />~-T- <br />