AgdaPkt 2000-02-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

H. Adopt Resolutions Endorsing Passage of Proposition 12 and Proposition 13; i) RESOLUTION 13832 ENDORSING PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 12, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000; ii) RESOLUTION 13833 ENDORSING PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 13, SAFE DRINKING WATER, CLEAN WATER, WATERSHED PROTECTION AND FLOOD PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000; 1. Approve warrants dated through February 14th, 2000 and usual and necessary payments through February 28th, 2000; MINUTE ORDER 00-188 The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote by those present. E. MIS HowardlIra to adopt RESOLUTION 13835 ESTABLISHING SUBMITI AL DATE FOR PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01, SETIING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON, AND ESTABLISHING DATE OF ADOPTION OF THE FINAL BUDGET FOR SAID FISCAL YEAR; And Revise Study Session No.1 date from June 7 to June 5, 2000. The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote b~ those present. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - A) Public Hearing on Zoning Text Amendment Relating to Large Family Day Care Homes: Principal Planner Passinisi explained the City currently requires a nondiscretionary permit for large family day care homes. The City grants the permits when certain conditions are met that pertain to providing parking, drop off and pick up areas, fire and State requirements and to be sure there are no health and safety effects on the neighborhood. The current process developed in 1991, acknowledging the need for the day care homes, has no notification requirement for surrounding property owners, no publication requirement, no spacing or concentration requirements, no cost and the permit is obtained over the counter. The Planning Commission and Council subcommittee are recommending a slight recommendation to this process, a required use permit. The use permit requires the City notify property owners within 100 feet and if requested, there could be a formal public hearing. This recommendation occurred because of a large family day care home that used a private access easement over an adjoining property owners lot to access the large family day care home. Another proposal offered was for the applicant to notify surrounding property owners and the City only require proof. Upon proof and agreement to comply with the standard provisions, approval would be granted. Unlike the Planning Commission recommendations, there would be no public hearing or fees associated with the permit. In summary, the approach presented would take less time, be less expensive but still provide notice to the surrounding property owners by the applicant. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 14,2000 PAGE 3 ."'..-.'......--T.