My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-03-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-03-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2005 10:25:30 AM
Creation date
6/28/2005 12:06:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/27/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5. <br /> <br />STAFF REPORTS - <br /> <br />A. Appeal of Zoning Administrator's Decision to Grant a Use Permit for a Church at 1406 <br />Radio Road: <br /> <br />Recommendation: To uphold the Decision of the Zoning Administrator to Grant a Use <br />Permit for a Church at 1406 Radio Road; <br /> <br />Principal Planner Passinisi stated staff received an application for a use permit for a church <br />at 1406 Radio Road. The site was previously a radio station site with the main building on <br />Radio Road and accessory buildings in the rear of the property. The property is located on a <br />recently adopted Redwood Shores Bayfront Zoning District and a church use requires a <br />conditional use permit. The use permit was granted subject to numerous conditions <br />including restricting the activities of the church to certain times, paying a one-time traffic <br />fee, prohibiting commercial childcare, requiring the removal and clean-up of all former <br />radio equipment, antennae, etc. <br /> <br />The use permit is being appealed by the Redwood Shores Owners' Association (RSOA) <br />citing the RSB District requirement of preparation of a specific plan. The RSB District does <br />state that a specific plan must be prepared prior to any development on the site. It also <br />states that the specific plan must cover the entire RSB zoing district which includes the <br />KNBR site to the north and the SBSA site to the south. It is staff s opinion that a specific <br />plan is not required for the church use. As stated in the City Attorney's opinion, included in <br />the packet, the specific plan requirement only applies to new construction and because the <br />church use does not represent new development, a specific phm would not be necessary. <br />The church plans occupy only existing structures and will not be expanding beyond the <br />upland or developed area of the site. Mr. Passinisi continued that a specific plan would be <br />beneficial if there was new development on the church and the adjoining properties so that <br />the City could see the relationships of the buildings, the roads and all the infrastructure. <br />However, KNBR has stated that it has no plans to build on their property to the north, nor <br />does SBSA have any interest in building out on their property. There is a condition in the <br />use permit, that any expansion of the church would trigger a specific plan. <br /> <br />In conclusion, staff believes that Council should uphold the decision of the Zoning <br />Administrator and that no specific plan be required for church use. <br /> <br />Council questions were addressed concerning definition of area plan and specific plan, the <br />intent of the ordinance and questions about infrastructure work needing to be done. <br /> <br />City Attorney Schricker made a statement with respect to the representative of the owner of <br />the property, the Fully Alive Church. He stated the counsel representing the client, formerly <br />represented the City of Redwood City in context of the Corps of Engineers permit for the <br />levee project. They ceased represention sometime in 1995-1996, but as a matter of <br />disclosure, they chose to remind the City of that fact. Upon review, Mr. Schricker found no <br />legal conflict of interest in the particular context of this appeal. <br /> <br />March 13,2000 <br />PAGE 4 <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />"T - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.