My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-04-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-04-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2005 10:25:34 AM
Creation date
6/28/2005 2:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/10/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'7ß.' I <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br />Summary. <br />In 1998, Redwood City had a slower than average compliance time, according to the <br />ICMA performance measures report which compared the compliance times of various <br />cities. In addition, many (criminal) citations were not filed in court, and/or were not <br />addressed by the courts when filed because other items on the court's calendar were <br />deemed to be more important than violations of the Redwood City Code. <br /> <br />Redwood City adopted an administrative citation system for the following reasons: <br />. To improve compliance with the City's Code. by adding another option for code <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />. To provide a system which emphasizes public education. The thrust of an <br />administrative citation system is one of public education, which begins with a courtesy <br />notice sent or delivered to the alleged violator telling him/her of the offense and setting <br />a deadline for complying with the Code without issuing an administrative citation. <br /> <br />. To motivate people to take care of a problem, and in a timely manner. An incentive <br />is provided for people to abate their own violations, rather than to wait for the City to <br />abate a problem. <br /> <br />. To enforce a wider range of a City's laws because administrative citations can be <br />applied to lessor offenses which previously were not cost effective to enforce, and <br />which the courts were not interested in enforcing, for example weed abatement. <br /> <br />. To provide an option for treating a violation as a civil offense instead of a criminal <br />. offense. If one chooses to appeal a civil citation, an administrative hearing is <br />conducted under rules more informal than those of a criminal proceeding. <br /> <br />. To speed up the compliance process because most people comply in response to the <br />warning letter to avoid a citation. Others 'pay their civil fines before they become <br />overdue and are augmented with delinquency penalties. Furthermore, an appeal of <br />an administrative citation is quicker than waiting for a court date. <br /> <br />To increase staff productivity because citations can be issued by designated City <br />employees, including Community Service Officers (CSO's). <br /> <br />Staff recommends no change to the administrative citation process. <br /> <br />~~~ìSV~ <br />Deborah Nelson <br />Community Development Director <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />City Manager <br /> <br />DN:js <br /> <br />Attachments <br />1 . Accessory Dwelling Unit Survey <br />2. Sample Survey of Conversions and Units <br />3. Comparison Survey how concerns are received and processed by various Peninsula Jurisdictions. <br /> <br />-11- <br /> <br />"--r-----"---"" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.