Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~A"~' <br /> <br />recommended for four years. Thereafter, the program funding would return to previous <br />funding levels or if the Council wishes to retain an accelerated level of sidewalk replacement, <br />increases would be considered with the adoption of a future CIP. Additionally, $50,000 for <br />wheelchair ramps will be programmed from Traffic Impact Fees starting in FY 2000/01. <br /> <br />Project Funding recommended March 27 with no change R!commended <br />May 8, 2000 <br /> <br />1. The Storm Water Collection System upgrade funding is to provide a source of funding for <br />projects City-wide. The $50,000 amount in the first two years only allows for emergency <br />repair. Beginning in year three, $450,000 (and thereafter, up to $500,000) is recommended <br />per year. <br /> <br />2. Medians and Entries construction is not recommended for significant funding until the EI <br />Camino Real upgrade is complete. Funding of $10,000 in FY 2001/02 would allow a very <br />conceptual design and beginning in year three, the program could be funded for a future <br />project at $100,000 per year. <br /> <br />3. Funding seed dollars for a PAL facility as the City's match for any potential Grants is <br />recommended. The CDBG recommendation by Housing and Human Concerns Committee <br />is $44,000. Another $356,000 is recommended from the General Fund for a total of <br />$400,000. <br /> <br />4. Funding studies to determine the program needs/design of a Redwood Shores Community <br />Facility could be accomplished in FY 2000/01 and FY 2001/02. Funding for construction <br />could begin in year three. However, total funding of construction creates a deficit in year <br />four. <br /> <br />5. Shuttle buses are an eligible expense of a Traffic Impact Fee. A 25% match of $25,000 per <br />year would allow for three shuttle buses by year three. Staff would use this allocation to <br />apply for the remaining 75% Grant funding. <br /> <br />Alternative Fundina Sources <br />On' March 27, 2000, the City Council asked staff to bring back additional information regarding <br />two additional sources of funding: 1) Sewer Enterprise funding of the Storm Water Program <br />based on an increase in rates and, 2) potential funding for Park, Library and Flood Control <br />Projects from various State propositions approved by the electorate in March 2000. <br /> <br />Increase in Sewer Service Changes <br />The City Council could achieve a greater level of revenue for storm and flood projects though <br />an increase in the monthly sewer seryice charge (bills) to support revenue bond payments over <br />a 30-year period. Such bonds would be issued by the Council on the basis of a combined <br />sanitary sewer and storm sewer enterprise, which would require a 4/5 affirmative vote of the City <br />Council to amend current, separate ordinances. The estimates below indicate the dollar and <br />percentage increases to the projected FY 2000/01 fixed monthly sewer service charge of $18.84 <br />that would be required to generate annual debt payments which support various levels of actual <br />project proceeds. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />~r- <br />