My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-06-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-06-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2005 11:18:47 AM
Creation date
6/28/2005 3:51:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/26/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Member Hartnett spoke regarding volatility of sales tax and software sales <br />and stated that companies may be more aggressive in bypassing sales tax <br />necessitating closer attention to be paid with possible second year adjustments to <br />the budget. He further stated the need to be more regionally involved in regional <br />and statewide efforts relative to education local legislators and others in the <br />implications of the evasion of sales tax by software companies. <br /> <br />Finance Committee Chairperson Ira commended Mr. Ponty on staying abreast of <br />the issue. He further stated Council Member Jordan will be attending a legislation <br />seminar and recommended that cities should unite through the League of California <br />Cities as they are pursuing the issue. <br /> <br />Finance Committee Member Claire asked about recouping monies taken by the <br />State. City Manager Everett indicated the League is not expecting to pursue at this <br />point. <br /> <br />Council Member Jordan stated appreciation for the presentation on collaborations, <br />entrepreneurial ventures, efficiencies and doing more with less and would like to <br />see a report with outside consultants and costs. She requested a report on outside <br />consultants to be provided at the next budget session. <br /> <br />Finance Committee Chairperson Ira asked for explanation of areas of expertise <br />being contracted for and not present on staff. <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br /> <br />Pete Hughes passed out a letter dated June 5, 2000. He stated that there is a 45% <br />increase in General Fund Revenues and the expenditures are up 50%. He made <br />several points outlined in the letter. One specific point he made was the hope that <br />the Bayfront storm drainage plan be locked in for phases 3, 4 and 5 into the future. <br /> <br />IV) <br /> <br />Performance Measures and Objectives (by Peter Ingram, Public Works Services <br />Director); <br /> <br />Mayor Ruskin mentioned the first event was the Neighborhood Services Survey and <br />then the ICMA Performance Measurements <br /> <br />Public Works Services Director Ingram explained the Neighborhood Services Survey, <br />the objectives and the Performance Measures as they apply to the proposed budget. <br /> <br />Neighborhood Services Survey - some of the best models in private sectors use a <br />sampling or survey process in order to balance the perception with the data. He linked <br />the survey to the real world of doing business. He gave an example of Code <br />Enforcement and walked through the analysis of the results, then related it to the last <br />budget priority of esthetics. He related violations to the performance measures and <br /> <br />STUDY SESSION <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />JUNE 5, 2000 <br />PAGE 5 <br /> <br />.--. T <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.