Laserfiche WebLink
�OC•3 <br /> 2) Increase residential "Lifeline" water rates from $0.82 to $0.86 per unit of water (0 to 10 <br /> units per billing period) effective August 24, 2000. <br /> Alternatives <br /> The Utifities Committee met on June 6, 2000, and considered several altematives that were <br /> developed by staff. Issues discussed were: <br /> A) Continuing the practice of matching the "Lifeline" rate with the water wholesale cost. <br /> B) The standing guiding principle of funding the fixed costs with the monthly service charge. <br /> C) The use of non-operating revenues from `A' and 'B' above to fund future water supply <br /> improvements, water conservation and the potential development of recycled water. <br /> Conclusion <br /> After thoroughly evaluating each alternative, the Committee agreed to support a modified <br /> alternative and directed staff to proceed with full development of the proposed recommendation. <br /> The Committee's conclusions were: <br /> A) An Increase in the monthly basic service charge of 3.5% from $9.75 to $10.09, is required <br /> to cover cost increases that were previously projected and that reflect gradual, incremental <br /> and well-justified service charge increases to keep pace with inflation. Such an approach <br /> is seen as preferable to erratic changes. The Committee has also emphasized cost <br /> controls and benchmarking with other agencies to keep citizen's water bills as affordable <br /> as possible. <br /> B) An Increase in the "Lifeline" rate from $0.82 to match the new wholesale rate of $0.86 is <br /> a reasonable practice. All of the higher use rate tiers should be left unchanged now. <br /> However, the Committee is interested in looking at altemative conservation rate structures <br /> in concert with `C' below and a business plan update in the near future. <br /> C) Non-operating �evenues were identified as a prudent way to save funds for development <br /> of future water supply, including water conservation and the continuation of effort to secure <br /> a recycled water project. This was noted as consistent with the City Council's priority- <br /> setting discussions in early 2000. <br /> The proposed increase in water bills will not change the City's "Low Cost / Low Use" position in the <br /> benchmarking analysis for water rates relative to per capita daily consumption (see attached Public <br /> Works Services Performance Measure, Average Monthly Single-Family Water Bills Relative to Per <br /> Capita Daily Consumption, from page 276 of the Redwood City Proposed Budget, FY 2000/01/02). <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> If the Council approves the proposed changes to the water rates and basic service charges as <br /> recommended, a Redwood City residential customer's bimonthly water utility bill at the City's <br /> average consumption level of 22 units per billing period will increase by $1.00 or 2%, from $48.70 <br /> to $49.70. The bimonthly water bill at the level of 30 units billing period will increase by $1.00 or <br /> 1.5% from $67.70 to $68.70. See attachments for summary of fund revenues and expenditures, <br /> impacts to water/sewer bills at various levels of water use and benchmarking data. Increases <br /> would take effect beginning August 24, 2000. <br /> � /, <br /> i <br /> Peter Ingram Ed Everett <br /> Public Works rvices Director City Manager <br /> Attachments <br /> 1. Rates 8� Charges — Summary 8� Chart 4. Water Fund 10-Year Business Plan <br /> 2. Summary of Billing Impacts 5. Water Fund Guiding Principles <br /> 3. Performance Measures Graph 6. Ordinance and Resolution <br /> . _ __ . _ _ ._,.._ t_ <br />