Laserfiche WebLink
• Architectural Review Committee <br />Architectural Review Committee Members Present: Gee, Howard (7:10 p.m.), <br />Vice Chair Spotorno and Chairperson Gilman <br />Architectural Review Committee Members Absent: Raymundo <br />Staff Present: City Manager Everett, City Clerk Howe, Deputy City <br />Clerk Conly, City Attorney Yamamoto, Community <br />Development Director Patterson, Planning Manager <br />Church, Economic Development Coordinator Webb; <br />Redevelopment Manager Moeller, Community Design <br />Director Liedstrand <br />3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Diane Howard, Council Member <br />4. INVOCATION - Pastor Dennis Logie, Sequoia Christian Church <br />5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND CONSENT CALENDAR — City Council <br />M/S Howard /Pierce to waive reading of the Consent Calendar except the ordinances <br />by title, adopt the resolutions and the ordinances, and approve other items. The <br />motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote by those present with Council <br />Member Bain absent. <br />Elise Levin- Guracar spoke of the Kids Can Make a Difference campaign in which <br />students were asked to donate $2.00 or more to purchase links that represent the <br />children working together from every school forming a community. To date, they <br />have raised in excess of $10,000. and all of the chains were to be connected <br />representing that they are one district and community. The students sold links to the <br />Council and audience, leaving links for purchase at the receptionist area and the <br />chain to be displayed at City Hall. The request was made for the chain to be carried <br />on the City Council vehicle at the 4 of July Parade. <br />Jeff Filippi stated that after the previous week's Council meeting where he had <br />spoken about the proposed name change to Theatre Way and attempted to discuss <br />with Mike Kastrop coming together in a united effort to present a compromise. <br />Subsequently, Mr. Filippi stated that he had received some Cinema business points <br />dated 2002 and read a portion of the document. He stated that the process was an <br />atrocity in that after a year of discussion with the Downtown Business Group, the <br />renaming topic was brought up two months ago. He mentioned deception, excessive <br />business costs, a quality vs. quantity issue and other concerns. <br />CITY COUNCIL JUNE 13, 2006 <br />SPECIAL JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 2 <br />AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 60 <br />Page No. 494 <br />