Laserfiche WebLink
6. STUDY SESSION — City Council, Planning Commission, and <br />Architectural Review Committee <br />A. Downtown Precise Plan — City Council Study Sessions <br />Redevelopment Manager Moeller stated that the document would be guiding <br />change in the downtown for the next five to ten years or longer. It will encompass <br />the community vision and layout the guidelines and rules. She stated that her <br />experience is that the document will let the community and those outside know <br />the vision for the downtown and how change will occur. <br />Planning Manager Church stated that the meeting is the first of three meetings <br />and the intent is that a discussion occurs without decisions made providing an <br />opportunity for Mr. Freedman to report back on the community forums. Two <br />other meetings are proposed for July 25 and August 22 providing opportunity to <br />discuss more specifics about development control and the third meeting to focus <br />on public infrastructure. <br />Michael Freedman of FTB led the study session requesting that the discussion <br />between the Council, Planning Commission and Architectural Review Committee <br />occur prior to community input so that staff and the consultant can obtain <br />questions and comments prior to the input. He utilized a PowerPoint Slide <br />Presentation on file in the City Clerk Department. <br />Recess: 8:40-8.55 p.m. <br />Council Members, Planning Commissioners and Architectural Review Committee <br />Members asked various questions and made comments as follows: <br />• Are there standard percentages for anchor stores to small stores <br />• Is housing being proposed to be built over retail <br />• Would other districts have reduced amounts of the "red type broad brush <br />• There is a need for disposition of properties — for example; the Sequoia <br />Hotel and who owns the property <br />• Concern with the links to downtown and the Brewster edge <br />• Concern with the depot circle concept and dependence on the train <br />• The desire to encourage a public art policy was expressed <br />• Appropriate transition from districts and protecting special things to people <br />was expressed <br />• Approach to the area as "special" and requiring appropriate rules was <br />stated <br />• Is surface parking available since not shown in rendition <br />CITY COUNCIL JUNE 13, 2005 <br />SPECIAL JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION PAGE 4 <br />AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 60 <br />Page No. 496 <br />