Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/0 A ~() <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Placement of speed measurement devices very close to the humps, therefore, not <br />accurate measurement. <br />Noise readings need 24/7 readings to get full picture <br />Remove or grind down humps <br />Distance between speed humps is too great; move closer together? <br /> <br />.,. <br />,. <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Langton/Edgewood residents (since the 70's): <br />,. OK with being a new hump location <br />,. Increase in traffic will continue <br />,. More traffic leads to more speed <br />,. Too much distance between humps <br />,. Police enforcement of nuisance drivers needed <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />953 Edgewood is between 2 humps <br />,. Has seen history <br />,. Before humps, tried to get through light <br />,. Heard screeching of brakes at corner <br />,. Speed is down now <br />,. Residents are not disturbed by noise <br />,. Like humps, want them to continue <br /> <br />Written Comments from Individuals <br />1. I don't like the speed bumps. I avoid them if possible; I use Eaton and Hopkins Avenues. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />I have never liked the change in traffic pattern at Wellsley Avenue. It was better before <br />the change to one way. It is more dangerous now. <br /> <br />3. <br />4. <br /> <br />Can't stand the mess at Hopkins, Duane, and Broadway. It also is more <br />dangerous. Thank you, Gail Lynch <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />I really feel safer on Edgewood with the humps in place <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Betsy did a great job running the meeting <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />Can we get metal "protectors" like they have at 1220 Edgewood - I live on the Alameda <br /> <br />Next Steps <br />1. These notes included in packet for City Council members. <br />2. Trial speed humps will be on City Council agenda August 28, 2000. <br />3. Neighborhood Association meeting, September 12, 2000. <br /> <br />Notes Compiled by Peninsula Conflict <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />. ....,.....-',._-,.--'- <br />