My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-10-16
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-10-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:23:21 PM
Creation date
7/6/2005 8:58:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
10/16/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> � �� <br /> .�mpression that neighbors could protest and stop the project even though it meets the <br /> ordinance Per State law, cities must approve the second unit as long as it meets the <br /> City's Zoning Ordinance. Staff could impose conditions on the unit such as to require <br /> different window locations to avoid privacy issues with the adjoining neighbor. In the <br /> original adoption of the A.ccessory Dwelling Unit Ordinar�ce, this requirement was ���en <br /> as a disincentive to the creation of units. <br /> 3. Retain the existing process (i.e., no notification or public hearing). <br /> I mpacts <br /> Neighbors may be surprised about changing densities and property appearance, <br /> leading to dissatisfaction with the process. � <br /> E. DENSITY LIMITATION <br /> The City can impose limits on the number of accessory units for each neighborhood or <br /> block in order to avoid over concentrations of such units. The City of San Carlos is one of <br /> the few cities that has a density limit. It currently allows one accessory unit per block <br /> subject to discretion of the Planning Director. Daly City also established a density per <br /> block during its amnesty program. Any density limitation will re-redistribute second units <br /> more equitably throughout the City. <br /> Any illegal units that are converted to legal units as part of the amnesty period should be <br /> counted toward this density limit. Then certain neighborhoods such as Friendly Acres and <br /> Centennial Neighbofioods would probably be close to capacity (since they have the most <br /> illegal units), and the rest would be distributed to other neighborhoods up to a certain <br /> maximum number. <br /> For this reason, the density limit should not be set until after the amnesty period is <br /> evaluated in order to determine the number and location of the existing legal units and the <br /> maximum cap that should be established for other neighborhoods. <br /> Options: . <br /> 1. Following the amnesty period (see below), the City may want to conduct a study to <br /> possibly impose a density limitation of a certain number of units per block or <br /> neighborhood. All the details will be worked out at a later time (Recommended). <br /> I mpacts <br /> A density limitation will limit impact in neighborhoods where concentration already <br /> exists or where the potential of new units is greater. <br /> 2. Have no density limitation (current requirement). <br /> I mpacts <br /> Some neighborhoods will continue to have more concentration of accessory units, <br /> leading to more parking impacts and traffic. <br /> F. AMNESTY PERIOD <br /> If the City Council changes the standards, then there should be a term set in which existing <br /> illegal units could become lega/ by applying for permits. During this time the City would - <br /> also waive any fines or inspection fees. As mentioned previously, Daly City's amnesty <br /> program operated only during a 2 year window of opportunity. Based on the <br /> � <br /> . _ � . __.. . _ <br /> �.._._ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.