My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2000-12-18
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2000
>
AgdaPkt 2000-12-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:14:00 PM
Creation date
7/6/2005 9:50:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/18/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kelly discussed the industry trends and Planning and Redevelopment Manager Church <br /> addressed economic and fiscal impacts. <br /> Public Comment: <br /> Darcy Anderson stated she likes the Downtown's current image with its sidewalk cafes, <br /> national recognized library, Canada College extension, U.C. Berkeley Campus, Historical <br /> Museum, Jazz Fridays and the housing. She further stated she wants Downtown to be a special <br /> place but is unsure why a 20-theatre megaplex is necessary. She stated that possibly an <br /> alternative location would be appropriate. <br /> Clem Molony stated he was asked by the Chamber, Council Member and City leaders to look at <br /> the positives and negatives of the EIR, the objectives of the project, scale, transit opportunities, <br /> traffic, pazking and housing alternatives. He stated that he is somewhat in favor of the project <br /> and that this project is specifically directed at Downtown revitalization. Mr. Molony stated <br /> there are some EIR issues: seating limitation should be in place to address the parking issue; <br /> pazking gazage access should be adequate; signal coordination at Jefferson and El Camino Real; <br /> and a lack of housing in the project. <br /> Bob Baldwin stated the discouragement of small business is a concem and that possibly the <br /> decision should go before the voters. <br /> George McKibbin stated the presentations were good, but that he did not agree with them. He <br /> continued and cited bankruptcy rates in the theatre industry as well as tr�c and parking issues <br /> that currently exist and will get worse. <br /> Dave Simpson explained the various traffic issues in the area and questioned how there would <br /> be no effect. He specifically referred to the large complex at the end of Seaport Boulevard as <br /> � well as other buildings in the azea and the need to require developers to consider the impacts of <br /> other building and complexes in the area. <br /> Audrey Lehnen stated her opposition to the cinema complex in the Downtown. She stated her <br /> philosophical opposition to movies and concern of a potential unwanted element. Even though <br /> she felt the cinema would be successful in the short term, she expressed concerns about <br /> parking, overall congestion and air pollution. She stated one possible idea is housing with retail <br /> on the bottom floor. <br /> Michael Hitchcock stated he agreed with the previous speakers regarding housing in the <br /> Downtown, but wanted to speak of the parking structure and the use of the valuable Downtown <br /> land. He proposed a scenario where developers submit bid proposals for development of the <br /> property and provide parking rather than an analysis where free parking is expected and <br /> provided by government. <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 27, 2000 <br /> MINUTES PAGE 3 <br /> _ . .. __ _ _. _. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.