My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-03-11
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-03-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:30 PM
Creation date
3/8/2002 9:53:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />within walking distance of local schools, shops and that require a permit. It does not apply to specified <br />businesses. The bill would requires each county types of landscaping, including homeowner-pro- <br />transportation program to base its awards on certain vialed landscaping at single-family and multi-family <br />criteria. We need your input, please contact League projects, cemeteries and any project with a land- <br />staff if you have any concerns with this legislation, scaped area less than 2500 square feet. <br />Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: SenTrans; Hrg-3/19, <br />Position: Watch. AB 2734 requires DWR to prepare an updated <br /> model water efficient landscape ordinance by Janu- <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ary 31, 2004. It requires cities and counties by <br /> January 1, 2005, to either update their existing <br /> SB 1916 (Figueroa). Local Coastal Plan landscape ordinance so that it at least meets the <br />Amendments. Nonpoint Source Pollution. SB 1916 standards of the updated model ordinance or to <br />requires that when a city or county with a certified adopt the updated model ordinance. If thejurisdic- <br />Local Coastal Plan proposes a major amendment to tion chooses the former, it would be required to send <br />the LCP, the LCP be must updated by the city or <br /> a copy of its ordinance to DWR for evaluation to <br />county to include a nonpoint source pollution determine if the ordinance is consistent with the <br />element. This requirement would also be applied to updated model ordinance. AB 2734 also specifies <br />new LCPs being submitted to the Coastal Commission how local agencies shall enforce the ordinance. <br />for certification. The author's office and Coastal Finally, as currently drafted, the bill prohibits a city <br />Commission indicate that SB 1916 generally codifies <br /> or county that is not enforcing the model ordinance <br />what already is the practice of many.jurisdictions, as or has not adopted its own ordinance that DWR <br />well as requirements of the Coastal Commission's <br /> approves from receiving specified water bond funds. <br />review and approval of LCP amendments. Coastal The author's office has indicated a willingness to <br />cities are encouraged to review SB 191§ and send reconsider this provision. <br />their comments to Yvonne Hunter; care of the <br />Sacramento office; huntery@cacities.org. The Assembly Member Pavley has stated her intent to <br />League's Environmental Quality Policy Committee will work closely with the League and individual cities to <br />review this bill in late March. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, craft a bill that results in updates of existing water <br />Status: SenNatRes&Wild, Position: Review and efficient landscape ordinances and ensures that they <br />Comment. are enforced. AB 2734 also addresses issues of <br /> conserving water devices in homes that are sold. <br /> AB 2734 (Pavley). Water Landscape Ordi- Cities are encouraged to review AB 2734 and send <br />nances. In 1990, California enacted AB 325 (Clute/ their comments to the League's Sacramento office. <br />Chapter 1145, Statu~es of 1990), which required the In particular, we would like to hear from cities that <br />State Department of Water Resources (DWR) to adopt have adopted and are enforcing water efficient <br />a model water efficient landscape ordinance. The landscape ordinances, or have adopted findings that <br />model water ordinance prepared by the DWR would eradicate the need for such an ordinance. The <br />take effect by January 1, 1993, if a local agency had League's Environmental Quality Policy Committee will <br />not adopted its own water efficient landscape review the bill in late March. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, <br />ordinance or had not adopted findings based on Status: AsWP&Wild and AsLG, Position: Review and <br />climatic, geological, or topographical conditions or Comment. <br />water availability which stated that the water effi- <br />cient landscape ordinance was unnecessary,. AB 325 AB 2351 (Canciamilla). Water Quality. Manda- <br />(and the model ordinance and thus AB 2734) applies tory Minimum Penalties. As we reported in Priority <br />to all new and rehabilitated landscaping for public Focus #6, February 8, 2002 issue, the League is co- <br />agency projects and private development projects sPOnSoring legislation with the California Associa- <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.