My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-12-18 Special Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-12-18 Special Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2017 9:18:39 AM
Creation date
12/14/2017 4:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/18/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City <br />Notes to the Basic Financial Statements <br />For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />NOTE 9 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />Actuarial Assumptions – The total pension liabilities in the June 30, 2015 actuarial valuation were <br />determined using the following assumptions: <br /> <br />Miscellaneous Safety <br />Valuation Date June 30, 2015 June 30, 2015 <br />Measurement Date June 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 <br />Actuarial Cost Method <br />Actuarial Assumptions: <br />Discount Rate 7.65%7.65% <br />Inflation 2.75%2.75% <br />Salary Increases <br />Investment Rate of Return 7.50%7.50% <br />Mortality (1) <br />Post Retirement Benefit Increase <br />Entry‐Age Normal Cost Method <br />Varies by Entry Age and Service <br />Derived using CalPERS' Membership Data for all Funds <br />Contract COLA up to 2.75% until Purchasing Power <br />Protection Allowance Floor on Purchasing Power applies, <br />2.75% thereafter <br />(1) The mortality table used was developed based on CalPERS' specific data. The table includes 20 <br />years of mortality improvements using Society of Actuaries Scale BB. <br /> <br /> <br />The underlying mortality assumptions and all other actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2015 <br />valuation were based on the results of a January 2014 actuarial experience study for the period 1997 to <br />2011. Further details of the Experience Study can be found on the CalPERS website. <br /> <br />Discount Rate – The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.65% for each Plan. <br />To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for <br />each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be <br />different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run <br />out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.65% discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond <br />rate calculation is not necessary. The long term expected discount rate of 7.65% will be applied to all <br />plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report <br />that can be obtained from the CalPERS website. <br /> <br />The long‐term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building‐ <br />block method in which best‐estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, <br />net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. <br /> <br />In determining the long‐term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short‐term and <br />long‐term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical <br />returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound returns were calculated over the short‐term <br />(first 10 years) and the long‐term (11‐60 years) using a building‐block approach. Using the expected <br />nominal returns for both short‐term and long‐term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each <br />fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that <br />arrives at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short‐term <br />and long‐term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate <br />calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent. <br />66 <br />6.1.E. - Page 89
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.