Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Page 9 of 16 <br /> <br />Vice Chair Bondonno asked about the definitions of a host in Exhibit A <br />of the resolution, Section B, Page 9, Item 2, in particular, the ability of a <br />renter to offer their residence for a short-term rental. He asked what <br />exact scenario you envision this actually being and how would this play <br />out. <br /> <br />Mr. Aknin stated that first, the property owner could have a lease <br />agreement that may prohibit short-term rentals by saying no sublets. He <br />stated there may be circumstances where someone is a long time lease <br />holder and they spend a few months a year away and want to sublet <br />their unit to supplement their income – they want to make sure that is <br />still allowed. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Bondonno stated for clarification that they could sublet it, but <br />all the same conditions would apply. <br /> <br />Mr. Aknin stated that is correct. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Bondonno stated for clarification that they going to strike the <br />requirement of a business license. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Dell stated that is correct. She stated there are two other places <br />that make reference to a business license, which will be stricken. They <br />will maintain the registration requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Safdari asked about Dock Town and how that was being <br />considered. <br /> <br />Mr. Aknin stated they would not be applying the ordinance to Dock <br />Town. <br /> <br />Commissioner Guerrero asked for clarification as to whether secondary <br />residences or accessory dwelling units will be allowed for short-term <br />rentals. She stated that secondary homes and vacation homes should <br />not be included for this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hale stated that she has concerns that this could have <br />negative financial repercussions for the community. She thanked those <br />that spoke on this issue for broadening the commission’s understanding <br />for this issue. She stated she is focused on the unintended <br />consequences of these regulations. She discussed some particular <br />cases she is familiar with that might be impacted by this ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Safdari outlined elements he likes about this. He likes to <br />see Redwood City leading, however, this is a big issue to lead on with <br />risks. He discussed how demand for housing plays a role in dealing with <br />this issue. He stated he is in favor of letting other communities do this <br />first so they can see any unintended consequences. He would like to <br />see more study on the impact of taxes. He discussed considering the <br />difference between those that live in Redwood City full time versus <br />those that live in other areas or other states. He stated they need more <br />data before they make a decision on this. He stated that they are not <br />7.B. - Page 31