Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 1 x Executive Summary <br />1-24 <br />ƒ Strategy #3 - In California, county sales taxes are commonly used to raise new funds for <br />transportation and are increasingly standing in for federal funding. San Mateo County could <br />impose a new sales tax for countywide infrastructure improvements subject to 50 percent <br />plus one vote approval from County cities on the 2018 general election ballot. <br />ƒ Strategy #4 - SamTrans may have access to contributions from private partners, including <br />Facebook, which has the ability to build momentum with other companies with an interest <br />in providing enhanced mobility and access for its employees. This effort could replicate the <br />current example of Amazon buying transit assets (rail sets) for the City of Seattle and Sound <br />Transit, in exchange for service improvements and advertising space (train cars). <br />ƒ Strategy #5 - SamTrans could pursue federal grant funding under the Federal Transit <br />Administration (FTA) Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula funds, FTA Section 5339 Bus <br />and Bus Facilities Program funds, Federal Highway Administration’s Congestion Mitigation <br />and Air Quality funds through MTC for bus retrofit projects to install clean air emission <br />devices on urban coaches, United States Department of Transportation’s Infrastructure for <br />Rebuilding America competitive grant program. There is also the possibility of applying for <br />FTA Section 5309 funds (Core Capacity, New Starts, Small Starts), depending on the project <br />element and funding amount sought. <br />ƒ Strategy #6 - Federal credit assistance can take one of two forms: loans, where project <br />sponsors borrow federal highway funds directly from a state DOTs or the federal <br />government; and credit enhancements, where a state DOT or the federal government <br />makes federal funds available on a contingent (or standby) basis. These would include the <br />federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 1998, the Federal <br />Railroad Administration’s Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing program, the <br />federal Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles program, federal Transit Revenue Bonds, and <br />the State of California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank). <br />ƒ Strategy #7 - Value capture includes many types of revenue generating mechanisms, <br />including special assessment district financing, tax increment financing, and development <br />impact fees. As opposed to real estate developments, regional transportation <br />improvements like the DTCS recommendations are more difficult to associate value <br />generated by it directly to individuals and businesses. However, value capture tools can still <br />play a very important part in project funding. <br />ƒ Strategy #8 - Two general forms of (P3) structures are common: availability payment- and <br />concession-based P3s. In availability payment-based P3s, the public authority contracts <br />with a private sector entity to provide a public good, service or product at a constant <br />capacity for a given payment (capacity fee) and a separate charge for usage of the public <br />good, product or service (usage fee). In concession-based P3s, the government grants the <br />private sector the right to build, operate, and charge public users of the public good, <br />infrastructure, or service, a fee or tariff, which is regulated by public regulators and the <br />concession contract. <br />ƒ Strategy #9 - User fees such as transit fares are a logical funding source for transportation <br />projects and should play a larger role. The costs to run efficient electric rail systems are low <br />6.1.D. - Page 33