My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-02-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-02-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:37 PM
Creation date
3/11/2002 7:47:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/25/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROPOSITIONS 40 AND 42: NEW FUNDS FOR CITIES' PARKS, TRANSPORTATION <br /> LEAGUE SUPPORTS BOTH HEASURES <br /> <br />PROPOSITION 40 - What Ctttes Can Do to Help the LegisLature.) The funding would represent a <br /> significant amount of "new" revenue for the entire <br />The League of California Cities has endorsed <br /> transportation system. <br />Proposition 40: the CLean Water, CLean Air, CoastaL <br />Protection and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Act <br /> The constitutional allocation of these funds <br />on the March 5, 2002 primary election ballot. Upon would begin in 2008-0g and continue every year <br />approval, Proposition 40 would authorize $2.6 <br /> thereafter, according to the following formula: 40% <br />billion in bonds to fund projects throughout the <br /> to the State Transportation Improvement Program <br />state that protect California's water and air quality, (STIP), 20% to cities, 20% to counties for mainte- <br />fund the development of new parks and recreational <br /> nance, rehabilitation, reconstruction and storm <br />facilities, preserve open space and farmlands, and <br /> damage and 20% to transit. <br />protect California's beaches and coastEne. <br /> <br /> How much money are we talking about? Revenue <br /> Nearly one-third of Prop 40 funds are dedicated <br /> generated from the sales tax on gasoline is projected <br />directly to Local governments to fund much-needed <br /> to reach $1.4 billion by 2008-09. If this target is <br />park and recreation projects. Additional funding is <br /> reached, under Prop 42 the STIP would annually <br />available to cities through legislative allocations and <br /> receive approximately $560 million, counties and <br />competitive grants. To find out specific funding cities $280 each and transit $280. <br />information for your city, visit the Yes on 40 cam- <br />paign website at www.Voteyeson40.org/funding/ Transportation in California is currently funded <br />summary.htmL through several sources, but primarily through the <br /> state and federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel <br /> Proposition 40 is especially important to Ca[ifor- <br /> truck weight fees, optional local sales taxes, sales <br />nia cities that are attempting to provide residents <br /> taxes on fuels and a variety of other miscellaneous <br />with parks and open space and protect natural <br /> sources. PoLUng shows that gasoline taxes paid by <br />resources. The Yes on 40 Campaign asks that any city the punic at the pump are considered "user fees" <br />or representative interested in helping to pass and the public strongly believes those revenues <br />Proposition 40 please call the campaign hottine at <br /> currently are or should be dedicated to transporta- <br />(916) 313-4539. lion improvements. <br /> <br />PROPOSTI/ON 42 - Voters Leaning Toward Support Strong public support for greater investments in <br />A recent Field poll found that a measure to transportation contributed to approval by the <br />constitutionally dedicate funding for state and Local Governor and the Legislature of AB 2928 (Chapter <br />transportation purposes found that 53 percent of 91, Statutes of 2000), which dedicated the State's <br />Likely voters would vote "Yes", while 26 percent portion of the existing sales tax on gasoline to <br />would vote "No". transportation purposes for five years. During last <br /> year's budget negotiations this dedication to trans- <br />Proposition 42 would amend the constitution to portation was deferred for two years, but agreement <br />dedicate what is currently the state's portion of sales was reached to place before the voters a constitu~ <br />tax revenues on gasoline solely to transportation tionaL dedication of this revenue source. <br />purposes, particularly beginning in 2008-09. (These <br />funds currently are part of the state's General Fund, What Can Your City Do To Help? <br />and available for appropriation at the discretion of See page 5 j~or ideas. <br /> <br />PAGE 4/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. caciUes.org <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.