Laserfiche WebLink
LONG BEACH MAYOR WINS UNUSUAL RUN-OFF ELECTION <br />Long Beach Mayor Beverly O'Neill defied political O'Neill's strong appeal to the voters, even with the <br />wisdom this week by winning re-election to a third term handicap of a wdte-in candidacy, has drawn nationwide <br />as a write-in candidate not once, but twice -- in both press attention. News reports cite her 8-year perfor- <br />the March general election and the June run-off, mance as mayor in helping Long Beach achieve <br /> economic recovery as a major reason for her strong <br />The write-in requirement was triggered by Long support among voters. <br />Beach's term limit law, which limits a mayor to two <br />terms but permits a termed-out incumbent to run again O'Neill has been active in outreach and coordina- <br />as a write-in candidate. O'Neill's write-in candidacy tion with other city, county and federal leaders during <br />earned her the most votes in the March election, buther tenure as mayor. She also currently serves as <br />fell short of a majority. The wdte-in requirements also President of the League of California Cities. <br />applied to her participation in the June 4 run-off. <br /> <br />LEAGUE FILES PETITION WITH RU.C. TO B.O.E. SETS SEPTEMBER VOTE ON <br />MODIFY RULE 20A/20B SOF'rlNARE SALES TAX LIMITS <br /> <br />Early this week, the League filed a formal Petition Last week's Priority Focus incorrectly stated that <br />for Modification with the Public Utilities Commission the State Board of Equalization (BOE) had voted to <br />(PUC) regarding Energy Resolution E-3757, adopted limit the amount of optional software maintenance <br />by the Commission in Uamh 2002. The Resolution agreements subject to sales tax. In fact, the vote was <br />concerns funding of Rule 20B underground projects, not by the full board, but rather by the board's Busi- <br />relating to undergrounding projects on private property, ness Taxes Committee. <br />As written, however, Resolution E-3757 has been <br />interpreted to require utilities to charge their Rule 20A The full BOE board will vote on the proposed <br />budgets to fund a portion of Rule 20B undergroundingamendments to Regulation 1502, Computers, Programs <br />projects. If left to stan~ this interpretatior :ould r:ave and Data Processing, on September 11 at 1:30 pm, in <br />significant impacts on Rule 20A budgets and the ability BOE's Sacramento headquarters. According to the <br />of cities to determine when and where undergroundingBOE staff estimates, these amendments could cost <br />on public streets will occur, local governments $8 million each year in lost sales <br /> tax revenues. Some cities believe that this estimate is <br />The League filed the Petition for Modification to conservative, and the numbers could grow. If ap- <br />request clarification that Rule 20A funds are not put at proved by the BOE board in September, these <br />risk in order to fund Rule 20B projects. Southern changes would go into effect on January 1, 2003. <br />California Edison, San Diego Gas and Electric Com- <br />party, and Los Angeles County joined the League in For full details on the proposed amendments go to <br />supporting the petition. A copy of the petition is www.boe.ca.qov. Interested parties can submit <br />available on the energy section of the League's Web comments on this issue through August 19~. Corn- <br />site. ments should be sent to each BOE member, as wetl <br /> as the staff persons assigned to this issue (Leila <br /> Khabbaz at Leila.khabbaz~,boe.ca.qov). Information <br /> on how to contact the BOE members can be found <br /> through their website at as well. For further questions, <br /> contact Jean Kodnke, (9160) 658-8245, <br /> ikorin ke~cacities.orq. <br /> <br />PAGE 4/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />