My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-02-04
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:51:39 PM
Creation date
3/11/2002 8:58:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/4/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 680 - <br /> REALLOCATION OF LOCAL SALES TAX REVENUES <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City recognizes that local sales taxes are <br />among the last, and most important, remaining regular sources of revenue for <br />cities and counties; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, sales tax represents over 30% of all revenues for the City of <br />Redwood City; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 680 would give the State the authority to <br />reallocate the growth in city and county shares of local sales tax revenues in the <br />Sacramento region, as a pilot program for the rest of the State; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a reallocation of local sales tax growth represents a potential <br />loss of sales tax revenue, which any city can ill-afford in light of current economic <br />conditions; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the effects of this bill will further erode local control over land <br />use decisions and the ability to raise revenues for local services, and will create a <br />disunity among the fiscal 'winners and losers' that will result; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the provision of funding source 'bonuses and priorities' to the <br />bill's affected jurisdictions will give them an unfair advantage over and be at the <br />expense of any other jurisdiction in California, not just those in the affected region, <br />including Redwood City; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, if enacted as a pilot program, this concept of reallocating local <br />sales tax would be expected to extend to other communities, including the Bay <br />Area and Redwood City, where its negative impacts would be felt; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, California cities' experience with the State's existing authority <br />to reallocate local funding sources has clearly been detrimental, and with the <br />State again deliberating ways to divert local funds to help offset its budget deficit, <br />it would not be prudent to provide the State with additional authority to reallocate <br />local funds. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY OPPOSES ASSEMBLY BILL 680 - REALLOCATION OF <br />LOCAL SALES TAX REVENUES <br /> <br />F:Atty/Reso/Reso,1274 <br />013002 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.