Laserfiche WebLink
selecting a vendor, negotiating an agreement, and implementing the system. A permitting system <br />group was established with city staff representing Revenue Services, IT, Fire, Planning, Engineering, <br />Counter Services, Plan Review, Inspection, and Code Enforcement (all potentially affected <br />functions). A Request for Qualifications and subsequent Request for Proposals were sent to <br />prospective vendors. The group conducted interviews, witnessed software demonstrations, and <br />visited neighboring jurisdictions to observe the permitting systems in use. <br /> <br />From nine vendors, CRW was selected for the permitting system based upon having the most <br />complete response to the City's needs, ease of system operation, best response from references, <br />and lowest cost over a five-year pedod. The proposed system provides the features essential to <br />Redwood City's business needs (see attached Permitting System Features). The attached <br />Agreement has been negotiated, is based on deliverables, and is considered fair. The project <br />schedule indicates a 'kick-off' meeting on 2/11/02 and system implementation by July 2002. <br /> <br /> Alternatives 1. Continue with current permitting and business license systems. <br /> 2. Sign Agreement with CRW, but delete business license module and/or IVR ($6,500 and <br /> $48,000 savings, respectively). <br /> 3. Negotiate an Agreement with another vendor. <br /> <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> The permitting system hardware, software, and services cost $284,650. In 1998, the Council <br /> established a ClP fund of $176,000 for a permit system upgrade. We spent $7,935 on consulting <br /> services in the failed attempt to negotiate a favorable agreement with the BASP-selectad permit <br /> system vendor. We have encumbered $86,750 for the consultant authorized by Council on 6/11/01. <br /> There is a balance of $81,305 in the Building System Upgrade Fund. A $203,345 new appropriation <br /> is needed in order to fund the new system. It is recommended that the $203,345 be transferred from <br /> another CIP project budget (263-70015), the Roosevelt Avenue Reconstruction Project, which has <br /> a surplus of funds. Future annual software maintenance costs are $18,500/year in 2003 and 2004 <br /> and $23,000/year in 2005 and 2006, which will be included in the future operating budget (see <br /> attached Permitting System Costs). The necessary IT support has already been authorized and <br /> staffed under the current budget. The Council has determined that the permitting system costs <br /> should be funded by permit fees and has adjusted fees in anticipation of pumhasing and maintaining <br /> the proposed system. A periodic review should be conducted to ensure that permit fees continue to <br /> pay for the system costs. <br /> <br />,~hn La'~ffa~' I~ruce Liedstrand ~.d E~rett <br />/Building & Inspection Manager Community Development Director City Manager <br /> <br /> Affachments 1. Permitting System Costs <br /> 2. Permitting System Features <br /> 3. Agreement for Professional Services and Software License (CRW System, INC, d.b.a. CRW <br /> Associates) <br /> <br /> <br />