My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
PRC MIN 1969-12-03
RedwoodCity
>
Park and Rec Commission
>
Parks & Rec Comm Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1969
>
PRC MIN 1969-12-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2005 11:03:17 AM
Creation date
9/16/2005 10:50:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park and Rec Comm
Park and Rec Comm - Document Type
Minutes
Date
12/3/1969
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~.., <br />( <br />~., <br /> <br />J- <br />{ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />we do not have information on operating costs over the years nor <br />cost of recirculating system; that the culverted plan could be paid <br />for 'by bond funds, up to the amount of monies available, whereas <br />for the open stream system only those bond funds could be used for <br />the portion of the project that was related to flood control - <br />probably the bottom of the creek and probably the foot wall on each <br />side; that before Commission came up with a final recommendation it <br />would want to explore how much of the cost would be recovered under <br />the existing bond fundi Mr. Ullrich noted that it has been deter- <br />mined by the bond counsel that bond funds cannot be used for projects <br />and areas not originally considered, nor can funds from the various <br />bond funds - storm drains, water, or sewer - be used for other than <br />their specific stated use; explained the various funds and bonds <br />sold, mthod of redemption, and that bond issues passed under city <br />ordinance #1128 for district issues. Mr. Ullrich explained the ad- <br />visability of Commission making recommendation regarding type of <br />site utilization - open stream or culverted - as early as possible, <br />as decision would have to be made soon as far as the city is concern- <br />ed with regard to storm drain plans for the park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Morgan's motion to accept p~an A-an open stream system <br />on presently owned city property-was lost for want of a second. <br /> <br />Commission discussion was had on advisability of discussing the ~ <br />matter of Community Park Master Plan as agenda item 1 for the meeting <br />of Jan. 7, 1970, and this item only, the balance of agenda then beinq':'~ <br />handled at a regularly adjourned meeting on January 14th. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson moved that Commission discuss the matter of <br />the park master plan at our meeting on January 7, and then adjourn- <br />ing to the following Wednesday, Jänuary 14th, for handling of add- <br />itional agenda items, seconded by Commissioner Stuart, and passed, <br /> <br /> <br />~ Commissioner Morgan voting NO, and Commissioner Schenck <br />abstaining, and Commissioner Whitmore-being noted absent. <br /> <br />Mr. Sue was asked to provide xerox copies of the site utilization <br />studies which were presented tonight. - <br /> <br />2 - ~~9.L~BOR~~~p ~~l~~-~ ~~e!3~~o~9£L?~euLn~i!t~~1~: Mr. Sue said they were in <br />working drawings now which would be ready in a couple of weeks. <br />Commissioner Thompson suggested that a more appropriate name be con- <br />sidered for this park. It was suggested that names be presented at <br />the January meeting. <br /> <br />3 - ~IvtA_~_T..E.R_J~~ BIB !jw. Commissioner Thompson suggested a Master <br />Plan for utilization of Hetch-Hetchy rights-of-ways be developed so <br />there would be some basis for start of funding for such a project <br />after the SF Water Company installs its proposed parallel lines. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.