My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt00 CCS Planning & Engineeri
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Agmt00 CCS Planning & Engineeri
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2005 10:48:49 AM
Creation date
9/16/2005 11:57:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
CCS Planning & Engineering, Inc.
PROJECT NAME
RWS street system improvement
RMP File Number
304
Date
8/28/2000
Reso Ref
13959
Task Order
Yes
Box
6037
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT IIAII <br /> <br />:I'~ . <br />,r <br /> <br />CCS <br />PLANNING AND ENGINEERING <br />IItC~~rQA~T!D <br /> <br />6 Crow Canyon Court -SO" Ramon, C4. 91583-162J <br />(925) 314-1120 "FtIX (925) 514-1229 <br />F,.-mtlil: sro@)¡;C$office.com <br /> <br />FAX TRANSMISSION <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />AuguSt 9, 2000 <br /> <br />TOTAL PAGES: 2 <br />(Including this ttansmittaJ sheet) <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Peter VorarnetSanti <br />City of Redwood City <br /> <br />FAX: 650-780-7309 <br /> <br />cory TO: <br /> <br />FROM: ~arry Taylor <br />CCS Planning & Engineering, inc. <br /> <br />PRO.JECT: Redwood Shores Street <br />System Improvements <br />PRO.T. NO.: CCS 99051 <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Redesign ofRWS / Bridge Intersection <br /> <br />If you have any problem receiving this fax please caB (925) 3} 4.} 220 <br /> <br />REMARKS: <br />Attached per your request is our Staff Hour and Fee Proposal for the redesign of the Redwood <br />Shores Parkway / Bridge Parkw3.y intersection. <br /> <br />Please note the following assumptions: <br />1. The estimated average staff hours per plan sheet assumes that the revised sheets will be part of <br />th.e larger Bid Set, so that the Boiler Plate, Contract Section., and individual technical specs <br />would not have to be revised for a Stand-Alone Bid Set. <br />2. The esrlmated specification hours assume that the only required activity is to ensure that the <br />current requirements and ,anguage is appropriate for the Redesign. The Bid List will be revised <br />to conform to the Redesign. <br />3. It is asscmed that we have sufficient field survey data to do the Redesi.gn. (We think we have <br />the necessary data. ) <br />4. The average $taff hours and corresponding fee take into consideration that we know the project <br />area and we will not need to collect any additional data. <br /> <br />If it is decided to make this a Stand-Alone Bid Set, then more staff hours wilJ be necessary. <br /> <br />Likewise, if this is to be included as an Addendum, additional effort would be needed to r~ovc the <br />drawings from the current set and to revise the specs to eliminate reference to Work Site H. <br /> <br />r did not make contact with Tim McKimson ( AAM ), but I think his new cffon will be small aDd I <br />have in.cJuded my best guess for him in the atta.ched fee. <br /> <br />P:\9905 \ \admin\cQITOsponócntt\faxes\fax.23.rdwdc!ty .dol <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.