My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-09-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-09-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:38:09 PM
Creation date
9/22/2005 11:13:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/26/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9�1 i�o <br /> • As an elected leader, I stand ready and willing to welcome and promote video competition in my <br /> community without completely cutting local governments' authority to ensure service for all <br /> citizens and to receive compensation for private use of public land. <br /> Eminent Domain Talking Points <br /> Congressionat hearings on eminent domain are expected during September — a reaction to the <br /> recent Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London, which upheld the city's eminent <br /> domain action. Since June, members of Congress have been bombarded by messages from <br /> property rights advocates who are effectively painting the picture of govemment taking citizens' <br /> private property and giving it to private developers for profit. It is essential that city officials <br /> "localize and personalize" their message with examples of projects that would not exist but for <br /> the use of eminent domain or the ability to use eminent domain. <br /> • We urge Congress to slow down, take a step back, and consider the facts. The bills that have <br /> been introduced would create unintended consequences and severely hamstring our ability to <br /> promote the economic health of our cities and towns. <br /> • Eminent domain is a state-derived power. Decisions about the proper use of eminent domain - <br /> including whether additional checks and balances are needed to protect individual rights - are <br /> best left to the states and their political subdivisions. Congress should not and need not respond <br /> with one-size-fits-all, blunt, and overly broad federal legislation. Note that California already has <br /> laws that provide stronger protections for property owners than exist in Connecticut, where the <br /> Ke% v. City of New London case arose. <br /> • Without the power of eminent domain for economic development, our community would not <br /> have. Note: Insert specific examples of economic development projects in your community <br /> that would not exist but for the exercise of eminent domain or the opportunity to exercise <br /> eminent domain. <br /> • The use of eminent domain in our community is already govemed by state laws and local <br /> ordinances that contain appropriate checks and balances. We use eminent domain carefully, <br /> prudently and in the sunshine of public scrutiny. And consistent with the Just Compensation <br /> requirement in the Constitution, we ensure that property owners are fully and fai�ly compensated. <br /> Note: Insert specific local safeguards or processes you follow in exercising eminent <br /> domain. <br /> Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing <br /> A conference on "Removing Barriers to Affordable Housing" will be held on September 19 at the <br /> Ontario Convention Center, in Ontario. The event begins promptly at 9:30 a.m. <br /> The program will feature a number of topics, including America's Affordable Communities <br /> Initiative, global gateway regions, challenges and barriers to affordable housing and whaYs being <br /> done, and what the federal govemment can do to help. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.