My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt97 Charles B Warren
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agmt97 Charles B Warren
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2005 10:16:02 AM
Creation date
9/29/2005 4:45:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Charles B Warren
PROJECT NAME
property tax assessment
RMP File Number
304
Date
1/15/1998
Reso Ref
13229
Box
6042
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT "A" <br /> <br />Valuation & Consultation <br /> <br />SCHEDULE A: REDWOOD SHORES, Scope of work, 1 August, 1997 <br /> <br />The scope of work proposed is to provide a re-assessment to market value of the property generally known as <br />Redwood Shores, and consisting of roughly 3,750 parcels of real property. <br /> <br />The work will intend to comply with the Uniform Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice, and any ilddition,ll <br />stilndards of the California State Board of Equalization. <br /> <br />The dilte of value will be 1 january, 1998. <br /> <br />In general this assignment can be broken down into phases. <br /> <br />Phase I: New construction - This phase, to commence on or about 1 December, 1997, intends <br />to identify and quantify any changes to the properties assessed since lien date 1997. This includes identifying <br />new houses, condominiums, office buildings and other structures. It also includes identifying and quantifying <br />any alterations to existing structures which are material to their market value. <br /> <br />phase II: Residential valuation - This is the most time consuming ilni1lysis task in the assignment. <br />The scope includes identifying property sold within the last year and applying statistici11 techniques, such as <br />multiple regression analysis, to extract the important factors contributing to their vi1lue. The resulting models <br />will be i1pplied to the various neighborhoods and developments in the district. In the process, i1 s'lmple of the <br />sold properties must necessarily be inspected to confirm the vi1lidity of the models ¡me! the trends which they <br />i ncorpor i1te, <br /> <br />phi1se III: Vi1lui1tion of commercii11, multiple fi1mily residential, hotel, I.lnd, and property of oth(\r <br />uses. Portions of this philse, principally dilta colection run concurrently with rhas()s I .lnd II. The objective of <br />this philse is to Mrive at values for the properties within the district which are not individu.ll residenti,,1 parcels. <br />In some cases stùtisticill valuiltion methods are useful. but in general the v.lluation of tlwse property types is marc' <br />labor intensive. <br /> <br />Phase IV: Assembly of the assessment roll. Next to the residential rev,lluation, this is prob,lbly <br />the most time consuming portion of the assignment, translating the ilnalytic findings into consistent individu.ll <br />values posted to the roll. The assessment roll is the final product of the assignment and will be delivered in both <br />hard copy, with explanatory text, and in ASCII format for the use of data processing in creilting bond pilyment <br />bills. Delivery of this product is to be on or before 15 june, 1998. <br /> <br />pililse V: Assessment appeals - This task is not included in the fixed portion of this bid. <br />Necessarily, whenever property is reassessed, there will be some taxpayers who are unhappy, Their recourse <br />is to appeal. Defense of appeals requires the preparation of individual appraisals which are more time <br />consuming per property than mass appraisal, and time is needed to negotiate with the property owners. <br />Depending on appeal volume, time and cost will vary, Ten days are allocated to this iunction. but less have been <br />needed in the last two years. <br />Defense of assessment appeals is an advisable deterrent to frivolous or self-serving appeals. The <br />appellant's calculus must include the probability of victory, and the cost of that victory. The appellant should <br />also see the likelihood that any unrealistic valuation that might result in the process will simply be reversed the <br />following year, requiring repitition of an uncertain and costly process. If appellants see that the system will de,l! <br />with reill problems, but defend .and win cases which are without merit, such cases Me less likely to be filed. <br />r <br /> <br />Charles B. Warren, A\ìt <br /> <br />URBAN REAL PROPERTY <br /> <br />.!flll <br /> <br />l'OI,,'lI <br /> <br />S/rl'I'/ <br /> <br />S!III <br /> <br />rnll/(/.Ir!¡ <br /> <br />(,i/I/llmi" <br /> <br />').if. U <br /> <br />1'11/1/1 " <br /> <br />II; <br /> <br />U¡ (1');/) <br /> <br />FII.\' <br /> <br />í/'i <br /> <br />'JS.! IIII <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.