Laserfiche WebLink
July 15, 2002 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Bond Service Tax Rates - 2002-2003 General Improvement District 1-64 <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />It is recommended that the attached ordinance setting the tax rates for General <br />Improvement District No. 1-64 be adopted. <br /> <br />Background <br />The Finance Department has computed the tax rates required for bond interest and <br />redemption in General Improvement Distdct 1-84, using the Assessment Roll for the District <br />as equalized by the City Council sitting as the Board of Equalization. <br /> <br /> Assessed values compared to prior fiscal years <br /> <br /> 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Incr/(Decr) <br /> <br />Land $337,900,727 $454,239,270 $605,586,412 $498,390,162 (17.70)% <br />Improvement 436,085,189 479,383,750 525,304,000 532,357,750 1.34% <br />Total $773,985,916 $933,623,020 $1,130,890,412 $1,030,747,912 (8.86)% <br /> <br />Appraised values.have decreased due to a general decline in property values. <br /> <br />The recommended tax rates for bond service costs per $100 assessed valuation compared <br />to prior years are: <br /> <br /> 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 <br />Reclamation <br />Bonds 0.3211 0.2282 0.1985 0.1458 0.1139 0.1362 <br />Facility <br /> Bonds 0.3181 0.2155 0.1760 0.1466 0.1230 0.1359 <br /> <br />The recommended 2002-2003 tax rate for Reclamation Bonds is 19.58% higher than in the <br />previous year. The recommended rate for the Facility Bonds is 10.49% higher. The higher <br />rates for the current year are due to debt service being spread over a lower appraised <br />base. Although higher, the rate will not necessarily yield a higher assessment, due to <br />varying percentages of decrease between residential and commercial property types. <br /> <br />The impact of the rate change is illustrated by the following example where we assume that <br />the market value of a home has decreased 9%. For a four bedroom, 3 bath house with <br />an appraised value of $715,000 in January 2001 (land value $405,000 and improvement <br /> <br /> <br />