Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT <br /> To the Honorable Mayor and City CoUncil <br /> From the City Manager <br /> <br />July 15, 2002 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Advertisement for Bids - 2001-2002 Bike Path Improvement Project <br />Engineering File No. 806-04 <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />Adopt a resolution approving the Contract Documents entitled, "2001-2002 Bike Path <br />Improvement Project," and authorize the advertisement for bids. <br /> <br />Background <br />Some of the existing bike paths at Redwood Shores are in poor condition due to their <br />age, and many have suffered settlement and erosion problems. There have been <br />requests from residents to improve these pathways, because during the winter months <br />the pathways become "muddy" and difficult to use for parents with strollers, elderly, <br />children, and recreational joggers/walkers. The best and most economical approach is <br />for the City of Redwood City to improve the existing paths and upgrade them to the <br />standard Class 'T' bike path. ^ Class "1" bike path is for the exclusive use of bicycles <br />and pedestrians with a two-way width minimum of eight feet (8'). The standard for a <br />Class "1" pathway was established by the State, and was the criteria for grant selection <br />using Federal TEA funds. <br /> <br />At its December 10, 2001 meeting, the City Council had a discussion regarding the <br />multi-use paths and a presentation was provided by City Engineer, Jon Lynch. This <br />presentation was to summarize the several meetings which transpired over the past <br />year between the Homeowners Associations (RSHO^, and RSOA) and the City. <br />Representatives of both groups, including Councilwoman Jordan, were also invited to <br />meet with the City for a "field visit" and discussion, moderated by the PCRC (Peninsula <br />Conflict Resolution Center). The RSHOA did not approve proposed construction <br />primarily because of the widening of the pathways to the State standard of 8', which <br />they felt would reduce landscaping and promote higher speeds of bicycles. The RSOA <br />did approve the proposed construction because it would make the pathways accessible <br />during all times of the year for parents, children and elderly. The RSOA did also <br />appoint representatives to assure that landscaping was being addressed in the <br />proposed pathway designs. Council approved an action to move forward with an eight <br />foot wide panel pathway. <br /> <br />After almost 3 ~ years from the original application, the state has approved the plans <br />and specifications, and has authorized the expenditure of the Federal TEA grant for this <br />project. <br /> <br /> <br />