Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. Letter from the Mayor in Response to the San Mateo County Grand Jury <br />June 27, 2005 Final Report, "Treatment of Property Owners in Redwood <br />City Redevelopment Project" <br /> <br />Mayor Ira stated that because this issue has of high interest in Redwood City, he <br />felt it important to bring the letter to Council for approval. He opened the topic to <br />questions or comments. There was no comment. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Hartnett/Aguirre to authorize the Mayor to release the City's letter of response to <br />the San Mateo County Grand Jury June 27, 2005 Final Report, "Treatment of <br />Property Owners in Redwood City Redevelopment Project".MINUTE ORDER 05-198 <br /> <br />C. Council Member Bain - Utility Undergrounding <br /> <br />Council Member Bain stated that this topic is associated with his interest in <br />improving some of the City corridors and is similar to the activities on EI Camino <br />Real and Roosevelt. He further explained his knowledge of the County's plans to <br />underground utilities on Middlefield Road, from Atherton to the Redwood City <br />border. He subsequently began dialogue with City staff to explore ways that the <br />City might piggyback on what the County does whereby working with the County <br />or separately to underground utilities from the Atherton border to City Hall. He <br />stated that there may be opportunities and that direction to staff at this point is <br />not expected. <br /> <br />Senior Civil Engineer Voretmensanti explained that esthetics is the reason for the <br />City's undergrounding of utilities. He explained the various projects and <br />approximate costs the City pays in conjunction with street construction. <br /> <br />Council Member Bain stated his desire for staff to keep the Council abreast of <br />the County's plans as they develop and reserve the possibility for further dialogue <br />during the next Capital Improvements Program (CIP) discussion. <br /> <br />Council comments included support for further discussion under the CIP and <br />favor toward Roosevelt Phase III and Middlefield but not Whipple Avenue due to <br />it being an entry point to the downtown retail cinema project. <br /> <br />Howard/Foust to extend the meeting to 11 :25 p.m. The motion passed by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />JOINT MEETING MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br /> <br />September 26, 2005 <br />PAGE 10 <br /> <br />. .....,...~ ........-.....--....,...--....-..--..,...-....-----......-.-......-. <br />