My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-11-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-11-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2005 10:23:18 AM
Creation date
11/10/2005 11:40:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
11/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7'/1-/9 <br /> <br /> <br />Potentially Significant <br />Unless Mitigation <br />Inco oration <br /> <br />d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites <br />compiled pursuant to Government Code §65962.5 and, as a result, would it <br />create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br /> <br />The project consists of re-zoning an existing site which is not on a list of <br />hazardous materials sites. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has <br />not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, <br />would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the <br />project area? <br /> <br />The project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles <br />of a public airport, public use airport or a private airstrip. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />f) <br /> <br />For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in <br />a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? <br /> <br />See section VII e) above. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency <br />response plan or emergency evacuation plan? <br /> <br />The project would not impair or interfere with such plans. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death <br />involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized <br />areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? <br /> <br />The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, <br />injury or death involving wildlandfires. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? <br />The project would have no significant effects on water quality. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with <br />groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume <br />or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of <br />pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support <br />existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? <br /> <br />See section VIII a) above. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including <br />through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would <br />result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? <br /> <br />The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the <br />site or area, or alter the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would <br />result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. <br /> <br />x <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.