Reso 0093 PC17-13 PC Reso Granting Approval of a Use Permit - 1690 Broadway 10.03.17

Browse Search

WHEREAS, at the October 3, 2017, public hearing, the Planning Commission considered and accepted the recommendation of the AAC regarding the Project's proposed architecture; and WHEREAS, the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15332 Class 32 "Infill Development"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed Planned Development Permit, Use Permit, and Sign Permit applications would further the purposes of and appropriately implement the City of Redwood City General Plan, applicable provisions of the Redwood City Municipal Code, and the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Planning Commission, having independently heard, considered and weighed all the evidence in the record, finds that the above recitals are accurate and constitute findings in this matter and, together with the Staff Report and the application materials, including without limitation the CEQA determination, development plans, and all other documents, reports, studies, memoranda, maps, oral and written testimony, and materials in the City's file for the applications and the Project, and all adopted City planning documents relating to the Project and the property including the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, other applicable City laws and regulations, and all associated approved and certified environmental documents, have together served as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. Section 2. CEQA: In the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission finds that: As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 Class 32, the project is categorically exempt because the project meets the general plan and zoning regulations, is on a lot less than 5 acres within an urban context, does not contain habitat for endangered species, and would not result in significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, as further described in the CEQA consistency memorandum attached to the staff report. Section 3. Planned Development Permit PD2013-12 (Section 46.5): Subject to Modifications Outlined in Section 4 below, the Planning Commission finds that: ATTY/RESO.0093/PC RESO GRANTING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT -1690 BROADWAY REV: 10-04-17 PR Page 2 of 16