My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-12-05
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-12-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2005 12:02:25 PM
Creation date
12/1/2005 2:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
12/5/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />//1- .3 <br /> <br />are staffing reductions, a deterioration of overall community aesthetics, longer intervals <br />between litter pick-up and bathroom cleaning, deferred maintenance, removal or <br />closure of facilities that need repair or do not meet safety standards and the elimination <br />of recreation programs. <br /> <br />San Mateo County Parks and Recreation Division alone has an unfunded deferred <br />maintenance and capital improvement need of over $100 million and has had its budget <br />reduced by approximately 40% since FY 02/03. Staffing levels have been reduced from <br />94.3 FTE in 1990 to 65 FTE in 2005. Meanwhile visits to the County Parks has <br />increased by 250,000. The cuts in June 2004 resulted in staff reduction precipitating <br />the closure of numerous facilities within the parks and the complete closure of 4 parks 3 <br />days a week that summer. While closures of some facilities were lifted after the Board <br />of Supervisors increased funding for the County Parks division the following September, <br />budget related problems like staff shortages and safety issues created by deferred <br />maintenance persist. <br /> <br />Cities within the County have similar funding needs. Here in Redwood City, the <br />Department has tried to reduce costs to create the least possible impact on residents <br />but the cuts have been significant. Since 2002-03 the Department has eliminated 21 <br />full time equivalent positions (114 - 93) while visits to parks and community center <br />facilities grow. <br /> <br />These cuts have impacted the day to day operation. 80% of the color planting done in <br />the City has been eliminated, building and custodial maintenance has been reduced at <br />all of our City facilities, staffing levels have been reduced at recreation buildings, <br />recreation programs specifically the Kids Club licensed after school care program and <br />summer playground programs were eliminated and funding support for Human Service <br />providers was reduced. <br /> <br />The City Council, through its Capital Improvement Program (CIP), has been supportive <br />of a steady renovation program for our existing parks. The State Bond funds passed by <br />the voters have also assisted in our efforts to renovate existing facilities. However, <br />there has been no new acquisition of parks since those associated with the <br />development in Redwood Shores. The Council has been equally supportive of <br />renovation dollars for Park and Recreation Facilities under the CIP. However, despite <br />our best efforts the Veterans Memorial Senior Center, which was constructed in 1955, <br />is in need of close to $2,000,000 in repairs to roof and gutters, restroom renovations <br />and changes to accommodate new programming. <br /> <br />On the recreation side, the Council has provided dollars to after-school programs to <br />match state and federal grants secured, yet we still have 200 students who meet <br />eligibility requirements on waiting lists at the same time that we want to increase <br />preventive types of programming for children at risk of joining gangs. <br /> <br />The Process to Date <br />Parks for the Future is a wide-ranging group of local leaders that includes <br />representatives from non profits, cities, the County, special districts and park advocates. <br />Over the past year, Parks for the Future participants have been discussing a variety of <br />issues in a workshop format. A feasibility study and a voter survey (poll) were also <br />conducted. <br /> <br />2005 City Agenda format <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.