Laserfiche WebLink
<br />¿'¿-/ <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br /> <br />December 5, 2005 <br /> <br />Subject <br />Initiation of process to establish an Active Community Parkland Standard for Redwood City. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission (Commission) recommends that: <br /> <br />1) Council adopt a resolution of intention, directing the Planning Commission to consider an <br />amendment to the 1990 General Plan to establish an Active Community Park Land <br />Standard of 3 acres/1 ,000 residents, and <br /> <br />2) By motion direct staff to develop a nexus study for the purpose of considering a Park <br />Development Fee Ordinance in Redwood City. <br /> <br />Background <br />The Commission presented the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department <br />Strategic Plan, to Council on September 27,2004. A major focus of our presentation was the <br />Commission's desire to work on increasing the amount of active community parkland available <br />to residents and identifying mechanisms that would finance this increase. At that time, the <br />specific actions contemplated were included under Objective A2 of our plan: <br /> <br />. Develop and implement a standard for developer contribution to Redwood City <br />community parkland, <br /> <br />. Develop a fee that residential and commercial developers would pay in lieu of onsite land <br />dedication. <br /> <br />The first step in achieving this goal is to establish a "park acres per 1,000 residents" standard for <br />Redwood City which requires an amendment of the City's Strategic General Plan. The City's <br />current General Plan, Land Use Element (L 11), states, "That park land should be provided in <br />quantity and locations so as to be available for the use of all Redwood City residents equally." <br />However, the lack of specific quantification in the Land Use Element still means that as each <br />new development is brought forward the amount and type of park land has to be negotiated as <br />part of the Planning process. We found that among 12 Peninsula cities surveyed, Redwood City <br />and Burlingame were the only ones that did not have a quantified standard and associated park <br />development ordinance. The Parks and Recreation Commission feels strongly that we need to <br />insure that the residents of Redwood City do not lose ground, with respect to park acres per <br />1,000 residents as new developments are built. <br /> <br />Just having a standard does not mean that the developer will comply with the Commissions <br />recommendation for adding active community parkland to their proposed development. There <br />needs to be choices or a system in place to provide a developer with alternatives in complying <br />with these standards. For example, if a requirement for development of active parkland or a fee <br />in-lieu of development were in place, compliance with an active parkland standard could occur <br />by giving choices of dedicating land or paying an appropriate fee, or a combination of land and <br />fee that would be seen as a way to mitigate the impact of the proposed development on <br />Redwood City's parkland inventory. <br />