Laserfiche WebLink
Jq <br /> <br /> ($ in 000s) <br /> <br /> 'o~ ~ Los Angeles (CA) $83,452 <br /> Port of Long BelCh (CA) 83,144 <br /> Port of Houston (TX) 54,651 <br /> Port Evergledee (FL) 33,701 <br /> South ClrOJlnl State Poft~ Authority 20,834 <br /> )oft of TeCOml (WA} 20,833 <br /> Port of Seettle (WA) 18,853 <br /> Tempe Port Authority (FL) 12,164 <br /> Port of Sen Franctsco (CA) 11,527 <br /> l~) Port of Gulfport (MIss. State Port Authority} 9T727 <br /> I Total Top 10 Port~ S348,886 <br /> Total Net Income $379,959 <br /> Percent of Total 91.8% <br /> <br />Figure 6 looks et trends by summarizing data by geographical region for three tlscal <br />years, 1998-2000. The rankings remain generally consistent throughout, with the <br />following results: (1) South Pacific, (2) GuJf, ($) South Atlantic, (4) North Pacific, and (5) <br />North Atlantic. 'The one exception is in 2000, when the North Pacific and South Atlantic <br />switched rankings. There is one caveat to remember when examining the data in this <br />figure: ports self-seJect when responding to the AAPA survey, resulting in different <br />response rates from year to year. <br /> <br /> ];i~]re 6 U.S. ]'o~ts Only: ~et Income got' ];~s 1998-2000 <br /> ($ in 000s) <br /> <br /> No~th Atla~c -52,400 -16.4% -41,024 -10.4% -21,333 -5.0% <br /> South Atlantic 69,353 21.8% 43,268 10.3% 39,886 10.5% <br /> 6ut! 113,730 35.6% 93,816 37.1% 122,200 32~.% <br /> North Pacific 53,206 16.7% 42,750 16.1% 58,841 45.5% <br /> South Pacific 135,355 42A% 121,313 45.6% 177,~2S 40.8 *~ <br /> <br /> Toter $319,048 100% S266,031 100% S379,SSS 100% <br /> <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />