My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-04-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-04-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2018 9:56:09 AM
Creation date
4/5/2018 11:39:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/9/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
481
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
168master vision169public artOn Saturday just before 9 p.m., as a baby blue dusk curled around the harbor and the lights of the <br />Brooklyn, Manhattan and Williamsburg bridges began to twinkle in the distance, I stood on the third <br />floor of the Seaport and watched as the scaffolding of the Pier 35 falls seemed to evaporate. Only <br />a dancing column of water was left in the air, a primordial apparition that spoke of tropical heat and <br />dreams. The city itself seemed an enigma: Who knows how many similar mysteries it held? <br />Waterfalls is the sort of work that even new york’s former mayor, Rudy Giuliani, could appreciate. (The <br />twice-divorced, philandering moralist’s primary relationship with art consisted of his attempts to ban <br />work he considered offensive and to strip city funding from museums that supported such work.) It is a <br />critical hit (the Times’s Roberta Smith gushed over it in a review on Friday), and its $15.5-million price <br />tag was paid for almost entirely out of private funds ($2-million came from the state’s post-Sept. 11 <br />body, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation). <br />Some funders were motivated out of pure self-interest: the head of the Circle Line Downtown, which is <br />a main supporter, told me his boat-cruise operation is doubling its number of daily departures from the <br />South Street Seaport, from 15 to 30. And the city’s most active developers, who stepped up with cash <br />and material assistance, are flush from Bloomberg’s pro-development policies. <br />But the bulk of the funds were raised from more than 200 individuals, businesses and foundations one <br />dollar at a time by the Public Art Fund, a non-profit organization which has produced more than 500 <br />works since its inception in 1977. <br />Even if you don’t know the fund, you know some of the works, recent examples of which include the <br />return in the summer of 2000 of Jeff Koons’s flowering puppy, Anish Kapoor’s Sky Mirror in the fall <br />of 2006, and Takashi Murakami’s Reversed Double Helix, all at Rockefeller Center. Until July 19, <br />Rockefeller Center is hosting Chris Burden’s What My Dad Gave Me, also produced by the fund, a six- <br />story-high skyscraper made from more than one million Erector Set pieces. <br />And I adored Rachel Whiteread’s ghostly Water Tower (2000), a translucent resin cast of the inside of a <br />water tower placed atop a building in SoHo. A cunning temporary intervention in the built environment, it <br />stopped me cold when it caught my eye, as public art should. <br />Last week, Bloomberg told the world’s media, “What is art to you doesn’t necessarily have to be art <br />to the other person, or doesn’t necessarily have to be the other person’s favorite, and I think we have <br />an obligation to our kids to open their eyes. They don’t have to become artists, they don’t even have <br />to grow up liking art, but we fail them if we don’t give them the opportunity to know it exists and to <br />experience it. And then, when they’re adults, they can make their own decisions.” <br />Public-art advocates frequently speak about the need to cultivate artistic appreciation among children, <br />but I wonder if the emphasis isn’t misplaced. Children have a bottomless capacity for enchantment. But <br />to survive as an adult in New York, you have to form a second skin to protect yourself from daily threats <br />to your mind and body. new yorkers aren’t rude; they’re just trying desperately to not succumb to the <br />sensory onslaught. Public art pierces the adaptive armor and briefly reminds people of why they came <br />to this city: Because it is a place of wonder that reveals itself anew every day, if you let it. And you don’t <br />have to be a billionaire to appreciate that.8.A. - Page 90
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.