Laserfiche WebLink
�� �her emphasize water conservation and create incentives for conservation and <br /> disincentives for unwise use of water, especially outdoors. <br /> Finally, the Council gave direction to the Utilities Committee and staff on adjustments to <br /> connection fees for new development and requested that recommendations come back to <br /> Council for consideration. Subsequently, the Committee has met with staff and consultants <br /> to consider options on approach and specific methodology for what will become a"Water <br /> Capacity Charge" for new connections / development. While progress has been made, <br /> there remain equity and procedural issues to be resolved. Staff anticipates that the Utilities <br /> Committee will forward their recommendations to Council for consideration in the first half <br /> of 2006. <br /> As a consequence of the Council's actions on January 24, 2005, the staff has implemented <br /> the following update procedure for the Water Financing Plan: <br /> 1. Monitor actual bids and costs against cost estimates, reconcile annually <br /> 2. Update most recent fiscal year budgets and estimates with final, audited figures <br /> 3. Update 10-year financial projections — add one additional year <br /> 4. Confirm and refine financing (bond) needs for next construction phase(s) <br /> 5. Verify consistency with UWMP and incorporate Council policies (recycled water <br /> pricing, for example) <br /> 6. Send to Council for consideration, with summary of changes and impacts on future <br /> water rates <br /> Staff will make a brief presentation to Council that will highlight: <br /> 1. The findings and signi�cant update revisions to the Draft 2005 Water Financing <br /> Plan Update <br /> 2. 2004 Plan projections vs. actual Fund performance <br /> 3. Changes recommended to 2005 Update that deviate from 2004 Plan <br /> 4. Financial impacts to customers and Water Enterprise Fund <br /> Alternatives <br /> The City Council may reject staff's recommendation to approve the Water Financing Plan <br /> 2005 update and to sell bonds to fund the second phase of the recycled water project. In <br /> such event, construction of distribution pipeline improvements will not proceed as planned. <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> The 2005 update of the Plan does not materially change the strategy or financial outcomes <br /> established in the approved 2004 Plan. In the long-term — and even without including the <br /> costs of the Recycled Water Project — Redwood City water rates and service charges will <br /> rise significantly, driven primarily by the projected 300% increase (vs. a projected 280% <br /> increase described in the 2004 Plan) in the wholesale cost of drinking water over the next <br /> ten years, as the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission repairs and strengthens the <br /> Hetch Hetchy regional water system. However, as the Financing Plan points out, the <br /> potential rate increases without the project could be higher than with it. In addition, the <br /> increased revenues will be expended on a new water supply and distribution system that <br /> will last for 50 to 80 years, far beyond the 30-year debt service period. Finally, all water <br /> customers will have a much more reliable water supply by 2010 — and well beyond — to <br /> ensure that this essential resource is sustained for future generations. <br /> 2 of 3 <br />