Laserfiche WebLink
�,¢-z� <br /> EMINENTDOMAIN from page 3 ....................................... <br /> • The California Eminent Domain Limita- <br /> tions Act The McNea/Hipona measure requires a HOW AN INITIATNE GEI'S <br /> jury to determine just compensation before a taking <br /> of private property through eminent domain, and TO THE BALLOT <br /> prohibits taking private property for economic <br /> development purposes. It includes within the Filing initiatives with theAttomey Gen- <br /> definition of "economic development" takings, "to eral (AG) is the first required step leading to <br /> increase tax revenue, tax base, employment, qualifying a measure for a statewide ballot. <br /> housing density, or general economic health." TheAG's office has to prepare a"title and <br /> summary" of the primary points and pur- <br /> Measures Could Undermine Housing Efforts, pose of the initiative whicn are returned to <br /> Encourage Sprawl the sponsors and sent to the Secretary of <br /> State. This language is then used to print <br /> The likely effect of these proposals — if they petitions that will be circulated for signa- <br /> qualify for the ballot and are app�oved by the voters tures by registered voters. Signatures <br /> – could be to significantly limit efforts by cities and collected will then be filed with appropriate <br /> redevelopment agencies to revitalize blighted �unty officials who determine the total <br /> areas, thereby condemning many economically number of valid signatures on the petitions <br /> stressed neighborhoods to a continuing downward and report that to the Secretary of State. <br /> spiral. The measures could make it much harder to <br /> build in-fill projects, and thus could force new The Secretary of State will then deter- <br /> housing growth into surrounding open space and mine whether the total number of signa- <br /> farmland. <br /> tures is sufficient to qualifjr the initiative for <br /> Taken as a whole, these measures all forward a the ballot. The sponsors' goal will likely be to <br /> substantial reconstruction of eminent domain that collect about 1 million signatures to assure <br /> would significantly undermine the ability of the state enough valid signatures are on the petitions <br /> and local governments to make public investments to qualify any of the measures. <br /> in roads, schools, housing and other essential <br /> infrastructure. In other words, they go well beyond <br /> the issue raised in Ke/o, which was the extent to <br /> which land could be taken as part of a broader <br /> economic development plan. <br /> The League of California Cities will not consider <br /> adopting a format position on these or other mea- <br /> sures until they have actually qualified for the ballot. <br /> (See "How an Initiative Gets to the BalloY'.) <br /> PAGE 6- PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Website--wNrvv.cacities.org <br /> December 9, 2005 - Issue #47 <br />