My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt05 Charles B Warren, ASA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agmt05 Under $60K
>
Agmt05 Charles B Warren, ASA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2008 10:40:52 AM
Creation date
12/15/2005 4:59:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Charles B Warren, ASA
PROJECT NAME
GID 1-64 appraisal services
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
12/13/2005
Box
6586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Valuation & Consultation <br /> <br />SCHEDULE A: REDWOOD SHORES, Scope of work, 2006 <br /> <br />The scope of work proposed is to provide a re-assessment to market value of the property generally known as <br />Redwood Shores, and consisting of roughly 4,350 parcels of real property. <br /> <br />Theworkwi II intend to comply with the Un ¡form Standard of Professional Appraisal Practice, and any additional <br />standards of the Californ ia State Board of Equal ization. <br /> <br />The date of value will be 1 January, 2006. <br /> <br />In general this assignment can be broken down into phases. <br /> <br />Phase I: New construction - This phase, to commence on or about 1 January, 2005, intends to <br />identify and quantify any changes to the properties assessed since lien date 2004. Th is includes identifyi ng any <br />new structures. It also includes identifying and quantifying any alterations to existing structures which are <br />material to their market value. <br /> <br />Phase II: Residential val uation - This is the most time consuming analysis task in the assignment. <br />The scope includes identifying property sold within the last year and applying statistical techniques, such as <br />multiple regression analysis, to extract the important factors contributing to their value. The resulting models <br />will be applied to the various neighborhoods and developments in the district. In the process, a sample of the <br />sold properties must necessarily be inspected to confirm the validity of the models and the trends which they <br />incorporate. <br /> <br />Phase III: Valuation of commercial, multiple fam i Iy residential, hotel, land, and property of other <br />uses. Portions of this phase, principally data colection run concurrently with Phases I and II. The objective of <br />this phase is to arrive at values for the properties within the district wh ich are not individual residential parcels. <br />In some cases statistical valuation methods are usefu I, but in general the val uati on of these property types is more <br />labor intensive. <br /> <br />Phase IV: Assembly of the assessment roll. Next to the residential revaluation, this is probably <br />the most time consuming portion of the assignment, translating the analytic findings into consistent individual <br />values posted to the roll. The assessment ro II is the final product of the assignment and will be delivered in both <br />hard copy, with explanatory text, and in ASCII format for the use of data processing in creating bond payment <br />bills. Delivery of this product is to be on or before 1 June, 2005. <br /> <br />Phase V: Assessment appeals - This task is not included in the fixed portion of this bid. <br />Necessarily, whenever property is reassessed, there may be some taxpayers who are unhappy. Their recourse <br />is to appeal. Defense of appeals requires the preparation of individual appraisals which are more time <br />consuming per property than mass appraisal, and time is needed to negotiate with the property owners. <br />Depending on appeal volume, time and cost will vary. Ten days are allocated to this function, but none have <br />been needed in the last several years. <br />Defense of assessment appeals is an advisable deterrent to frivolous or self-serving appeals. The <br />appellant's calculus must include the probability of victory, and the cost of that victory. The appellant should <br />also see the I ikelihood that any unrealistic valuation that might result in the process wi II simply be reversed the <br />following year, requiring repitition of an uncertain and costly process. If appellants see that the system wi II deal <br />with real problems, but defend and win cases which are without merit, such cases are less likely to be fi led. <br /> <br />Charles B. Warren, ASA <br /> <br />URBAN REAL PROPERTY <br /> <br />Exhibit A-I <br /> <br />2033 <br /> <br />Powell <br /> <br />Street <br /> <br />San <br /> <br />Francisco <br /> <br />California <br /> <br />94133 <br /> <br />Phone <br /> <br />415. <br /> <br />433. 0959 <br /> <br />Fax <br /> <br />415. <br /> <br />982.1441 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.