Laserfiche WebLink
2. The proposed location is suitable for the proposed affordable housing, is consistent <br />with the Housing Element, general plan, and zoning, and will not tend to cause <br />residential segregation. <br />D. Other Alternatives. The City may consider an alternative mitigation program proposed by the <br />developer and the Community Development Director, such as the provision of off-site <br />affordable units, donation of land for the construction of affordable units, or purchase of <br />existing units for conversion to affordable units. <br />E. Agreement with City for Financing. If the City enters into a financing agreement with the <br />applicant, the parties may agree to alter the requirements of Section 29.6 (Standards for <br />Affordable Housing). <br />F. Significant Number of Affordable Units. If an applicant exceeds the maximum percentage of <br />affordable units set forth in the state density bonus law for low or very low income rental or <br />moderate income ownership units, the City will consider an applicant's request to alter the <br />requirements of Section 29.6 (Standards for Affordable Housing) in conjunction with its <br />review of the planning application for the project and may reject or accept the request in its <br />sole discretion. <br />29.9 Waiver of Requirements <br />A. Timing of Request. A developer may apply for a reduction, adjustment, or waiver of the <br />requirements of this Article as part of an application for the first approval of a planning or <br />building permit for a residential development project. <br />B. Application Requirements. The developer must show that applying the requirements of this <br />Article would result in an unconstitutional taking of property or would result in any other <br />unconstitutional result. The developer shall set forth in detail the factual and legal basis for <br />the claim, including all supporting technical documentation, and shall bear the burden of <br />presenting the requisite evidence to demonstrate the alleged unconstitutional result. <br />C. City Assumptions. The City may assume each of the following when applicable: <br />1. The developer will benefit from the incentives set forth in State Density Bonus Law <br />and the municipal code; and <br />2. The developer will be obligated to provide the most economical affordable housing <br />units feasible in terms of financing, construction, design, location and tenure. <br />D. Decision. The review authority, based upon legal advice provided by or at the behest of the <br />City Attorney, may approve a reduction, adjustment, or waiver of the requirements of this <br />Article if the review authority determines that applying the requirements of this Article <br />would effectuate an unconstitutional taking of property or otherwise have an <br />unconstitutional application to the property. The reduction, adjustment, or waiver may be <br />approved only to the extent necessary to avoid an unconstitutional result after adoption of <br />written findings, based on legal analysis and the evidence. <br />E. Changes to the Project. If a reduction, adjustment, or waiver is granted, any change in the <br />residential development project shall invalidate the reduction, adjustment, or waiver, and a <br />new application shall be required for a reduction, adjustment, or waiver per this section. <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO RECOMMENDING COUNCIL TO ADOPT ARTICLE 29 AFFORDABLE HOUSING <br />REV: 05-07-18 PR <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />