My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OAK #4843-3885-9090 v10 38 <br />ATTY/AGR/2018.094/STRADA DOCKTOWN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT <br />REV: 05-03-18 PR <br />Page 38 of 93 <br />Section 10.5 Reserved. <br />Section 10.6 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. <br />A. The filing of any third party lawsuit(s) against City or Developer relating to <br />the Project Approvals or this Agreement or construction of the Project shall not delay or stop the <br />development, processing, or construction of the Project or approval of any Subsequent Approvals, <br />unless the third party obtains a court order preventing the activity. City shall not stipulate to or <br />cooperate in the issuance of any such order. <br />B. City and Developer shall cooperate in the defense of any court action or <br />proceeding instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the <br />validity of any provision of the Project Approvals or this Agreement (“Litigation Challenge”), <br />and the Parties shall keep each other informed of all developments relating to such defense, subject <br />only to confidentiality requirements that may prevent the communication of such information. To <br />the extent Developer desires to contest or defend such Litigation Challenge, (a) Developer shall <br />take the lead role defending such Litigation Challenge and may, in its sole discretion, elect to be <br />represented by the legal counsel of its choice; (b) City may, in its sole discretion, elect to be <br />separately represented by the legal counsel of its choice, with the reasonable costs of such <br />representation to be paid by Developer; (c) Developer shall reimburse City, within thirty (30) days <br />following City’s written demand therefor, which may be made from time to time during the course <br />of such Litigation Challenge, all reasonable costs incurred by City in connection with the Litigation <br />Challenge, including City’s reasonable administrative, legal, and court costs and City Attorney <br />oversight expenses; and (d) Developer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City Parties <br />from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or cost awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded <br />under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against City by way of <br />judgment, settlement, or stipulation. Upon request by Developer, City shall enter into a joint <br />defense agreement in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney to facilitate the sharing of <br />materials and strategies related to the defense of such Litigation Challenge without waiver of <br />attorney client privilege. Any proposed settlement of a Litigation Challenge by a Party shall be <br />subject to the approval of the other Party, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, <br />conditioned, or delayed. If the terms of the proposed settlement would constitute an amendment <br />or modification of this Agreement or any Project Approvals, the settlement shall not become <br />effective unless such amendment or modification is approved by City in accordance with <br />Applicable Law, and City reserves its full legislative discretion with respect thereto. If Developer <br />opts not to contest or defend such Litigation Challenge, City shall have no obligation to do so, but <br />shall have the right to do so at its own expense. <br />Section 10.7 Revision to Project. In the event of a court order issued as a result of a <br />successful Litigation Challenge, City shall, to the extent permitted by law or court order, in good <br />faith seek to comply with the court order in such a manner as will maintain the integrity of the <br />Project Approvals and avoid or minimize to the greatest extent possible (a) any impact to the <br />development of the Project as provided for in, and contemplated by, the Project Approvals and this <br />Agreement, or (b) any conflict with the Project Approvals or this Agreement or frustration of the <br />intent or purpose of the Project Approvals or this Agreement. <br />6.4.B. - Page 63
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.