My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 4 – Options with State Density Bonus <br />Percent <br />Affordability <br />Bonus <br />Density <br />Number of <br />Concessions <br />5% Very Low 20% 1 <br />12% Very Low 35% 2 <br />5% Low None 0 <br />15% Low 27.5% 1 <br />10% Moderate <br />(Ownership) <br />5% 1 <br />15% Moderate <br />(Ownership) <br />10% 1 <br />20% Moderate <br />(Ownership) <br />15% 2 <br /> <br />Concessions granted through state density bonus could include additional height <br />beyond what the zoning district allows, reduced setbacks or other site development <br />deviations. In addition, density bonus projects also automatically qualify for a reduced <br />parking rate, apart from the allowed concessions. <br /> <br />Per state law, cities must adopt density bonus submittal requirements and specify <br />preferred concessions and incentives. The amendments to Section 32.19 (Attachment <br />1) provides application requirements, and creates a two-tier system for concessions. <br />Preferred concessions do not require separate financial analysis, while all other <br />concessions do require the analysis. In all cases developers will be required to submit a <br />narrative explaining why they are requesting the concession, and the review authority <br />must approve the concession unless certain specific findings could be made. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends a broad list of preferred concessions, including: <br />building height, parking and rear yard setback, but not including the deferred payment of <br />development impact fees, as further explained below. Deviations not listed would <br />require financial analysis identifying how the incentive reduces costs and allows for the <br />production of affordable housing. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Update the State Density Bonus section to reflect <br />the bonuses and concessions that may be granted to projects providing on-site <br />affordable units. <br />7.A. - Page 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.