My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Ownership <br />• 15% of the units affordable to Moderate Income households3 <br />• In lieu fee is the difference between the sales price and the affordable price <br />• Fractional units pay a percent of the in lieu fee <br />• Retain the impact fee for developments under 20 units, and no fee for fewer than 5 units. <br />Rental <br />Set Aside and AMI Targeting <br />The consultant team modeled a 225 unit rental development typical of what might be built in Redwood <br />City. It included a mix of unit sizes from studios to three bedrooms, with most of the units being one <br />bedroom or two bedroom. The density was assumed to be 225 units per acre. The total development <br />cost was approximately $133.64 million, including affordable housing impact fees. <br />We assumed the following unit sizes and rents <br />Unit Type Number in <br />development <br />Square Footage Rents <br />Studio 16 563 $2,821 <br />1 Bedroom 135 774 $3,351 <br />2 Bedroom 68 1,149 $4,389 <br />3 Bedroom 6 1,441 $5,519 <br /> <br />The team then modeled what would happen with a 15 percent inclusionary zoning requirement <br />affordable to Very Low Income households as well as Low Income Households. The developer would be <br />entitled to a 27.5% density bonus for the Low Income units and a 35% density bonus for the Very Low <br />Income units. They would also be entitled to flexibility in the zoning code4. Additionally, the city would <br />typically no longer charge affordable housing impact fees, reducing the costs for developers by $22,500 <br />per unit. <br />The model also assumes lower land costs. (Or potentially land costs that stay constant as all other costs <br />increase.) Holding all other factors constant, real estate economics predicts that prices for developable <br />land will decrease based on new government requirements. This is consistent with the experience of <br />other cities as well. We initially assume land prices will drop 5%, but see below for calculations for <br />achieving 20% of the units as affordable. <br /> <br />3 Moderate income units are available to households making up to 120% of the Area Median Income and the <br />pricing is based on 100% of the Area Median Income. <br />4 The density bonus calculation is complicated in several ways. The density bonus could increase the cost of <br />construction if different building technologies are needed, while the required zoning flexibility could reduce it. <br />Therefore, we do not change the cost of construction. The model assumes that developers will only use a 25% <br />bonus to be conservative. <br />7.A. - Page 50
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.