My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Point of indifference or Amount developer is willing to pay: $14,400,000 <br />Price per affordable unit: $423,529 or ($14,400,000 / 34 affordable units) <br />Price per market rate units: ($14,400,000 / 191 market rate units) <br /> <br />15% Very Low Income development with density bonus <br />The formula is slightly different when accounting for the density bonus. <br />[Profit with no requirements] - [Profit with density bonus and affordable units] = [Point of indifference] <br />Point of indifference / Amount developer is willing to pay: [31,740,000] - [29,600,000] = [$2,090,000]8 <br />Price per affordable unit: $61,500 or ($2,090,000 / 34 Affordable units) <br />Price per market rate units: $10,900 or ($2,090,000 / 191 Market rate units)9 <br /> <br />Methodology - <br />Our assumptions are based on a median quality Type III construction project for rental and V for <br />ownership without unusual site work, construction or parking requirements, and that the project is built <br />without a prevailing wage requirement. Affordable rates are priced ten percentage points below the <br />maximum permitted rents to ensure an adequate pool of potential renters. <br />Sources: <br />Rents, unit size, amenities and operating assumptions: Databases (CoStar and Axiom Metrics). <br />Interviews with sales brokers, managers of completed projects and developers. Review of city records <br />on projects in various stages of development in Redwood City. General internet research. <br />Interest rates and terms: Interviews with mortgage brokers and developers. <br />Sales prices of completed rental developments, land price and capitalization rate: Databases (CoStar, <br />Chicago Title, Old Republic Title), Mortgage firm reports. Interviews with land brokers, developers. <br />Profit thresholds: Interviews with developers, sales brokers and mortgage brokers. <br />Construction costs: Interviews with active developers in Redwood City and general contractors. <br /> <br />8 Numbers may not add up do to rounding <br />9 This is based on the number of market rate units without density bonus because in the in lieu fee example, the <br />developer would no longer be entitled to the extra units. <br />7.A. - Page 55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.