AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0041/CC RESO DENYING THE APPEAL FOR 353 MAIN STREET REV: 05-14-18 PR Page 27 of 28 in courtyards, or orienting the terraces to alleyways rather than streets, whenever possible. ii. Air conditioning should be provided in all units so that windows can remain closed to maintain interior noise levels below 45 dBA CNEL. iii. Residential units proposed within 100 feet of Veterans Boulevard centerline, where noise levels would exceed 70 dB CNEL, should incorporate sound-rated windows and construction methods. iv. A detailed analysis of residential interior noise levels shall be completed during design following the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code. The report will confirm that the design includes the noise control treatments necessary to achieve compliance with the noise standards. Other Agency Permits 86. Creek Jurisdictional Agencies - If any portion of the proposed work is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the US Army Corp of Engineers, CA Fish and Wildlife, or CA Regional Water Quality Control Board, the applicant shall contact the appropriate agencies to obtain all necessary Encroachment Permits prior to starting work. [SDR][ENGINEERING] General Requirements 87. Exterior Materials – The exterior materials, colors, textures, trim elements, windows and roof pitch of the project shall be consistent throughout and substantially conform to the colors and materials board, date received February 9, 2018, on file with Planning Services. [COA][PLANNING] 88. Modifications - Modifications to the approved plans require Planning review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Minor project modifications required to meet building, fire, and safety codes at time of building permit plan check may be allowed, at the City’s discretion. Substantial modification of approved plans, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, may be subject to an amendment or a new Permit. [COA][PLANNING] 89. Indemnification – Per Redwood City Code Section 1.54, Applicant shall defend (with counsel approved by City), indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from and against any claim, action, or proceeding (including without limitation any appeal or petition for review thereof) against the City or its agents, officers or employees related to an approval of the Project, including without limitation any related application, permit, certification, condition, environmental determination, other approval, compliance or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, and/or processing methods (“Challenge”). City may (but is not obligated to) defend such Challenge as City, in its sole discretion, determines appropriate, all at applicant’s sole cost and expense. Applicant shall bear any and all losses, damages, injuries, liabilities, costs, and expenses 7.B. - Page 52