Laserfiche WebLink
retiree unfunded accrued liabilities (UAL), as well as both active and retiree healthcare <br />and other post-employment retirement benefits (OPEB). <br /> <br />Additionally, AB 1912 would mandate that public retirement systems, like California <br />Public Retirement System (CalPERS), file suit against all local or state agencies that <br />have ever been a member of a terminated JPA for all retirement related obligations. The <br />bill also prohibits any retirement system from approving a new JPA without a contract <br />containing express joint and several liability provisions. <br /> <br />Moreover, the provisions set forth in AB 1912 create potential constitutional, fiscal, and <br />operational challenges, which would effectively eliminate the ability for local and state <br />agencies to create or maintain the use of most JPA’s. <br /> <br />Specifically, AB 1912: <br /> <br />· May conflict with Provisions of the California State Constitution: <br />The California constitutional debt limit prohibits an agency from incurring <br />indebtedness beyond the agency’s ability to pay the debt back from revenues <br />received in the same fiscal year without the approval of two-thirds of its voters. <br />These safeguards were placed in the State’s constitution to avoid a situation in <br />which bond issuers might compel an increase in taxes or foreclose on local <br />government assets. By applying retroactive joint and several liability to existing <br />contracts, we have strong concerns that Redwood City will incur significant debts <br />that may exceed our annual revenue without receiving voter approval—thus <br />arguably violating the California Constitution. <br /> <br />Further, it can be argued that retroactively incurring debts of another agency <br />violates article XVI, §6 of the California Constitution which prohibits an agency <br />from giving or lending public funds to any person, public or private entity. A JPA <br />is an independent governmental body whereby the City has no legal, statutory <br />oversight or managing authority. Liabilities from such entities retroactively applied <br />to each member agency could constitute a gift of public funds to an individual(s) <br />and/or public entity. <br /> <br />· Gives Retirement Agency Authority to Increase the Amount Owed Through <br />Assumption Changes and/or Investment Losses: <br />Retirement obligations are unlike other forms of traditional debts and liabilities. <br />Unfunded retirement liabilities are particularly volatile and can grow to <br />insurmountable costs based on no fault of the agencies who contract with a <br />retirement system for health and pension benefits. It is estimated that in FY <br />9.A. - Page 2