My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
retiree unfunded accrued liabilities (UAL), as well as both active and retiree healthcare <br />and other post-employment retirement benefits (OPEB). <br /> <br />Additionally, AB 1912 would mandate that public retirement systems, like California <br />Public Retirement System (CalPERS), file suit against all local or state agencies that <br />have ever been a member of a terminated JPA for all retirement related obligations. The <br />bill also prohibits any retirement system from approving a new JPA without a contract <br />containing express joint and several liability provisions. <br /> <br />Moreover, the provisions set forth in AB 1912 create potential constitutional, fiscal, and <br />operational challenges, which would effectively eliminate the ability for local and state <br />agencies to create or maintain the use of most JPA’s. <br /> <br />Specifically, AB 1912: <br /> <br />· May conflict with Provisions of the California State Constitution: <br />The California constitutional debt limit prohibits an agency from incurring <br />indebtedness beyond the agency’s ability to pay the debt back from revenues <br />received in the same fiscal year without the approval of two-thirds of its voters. <br />These safeguards were placed in the State’s constitution to avoid a situation in <br />which bond issuers might compel an increase in taxes or foreclose on local <br />government assets. By applying retroactive joint and several liability to existing <br />contracts, we have strong concerns that Redwood City will incur significant debts <br />that may exceed our annual revenue without receiving voter approval—thus <br />arguably violating the California Constitution. <br /> <br />Further, it can be argued that retroactively incurring debts of another agency <br />violates article XVI, §6 of the California Constitution which prohibits an agency <br />from giving or lending public funds to any person, public or private entity. A JPA <br />is an independent governmental body whereby the City has no legal, statutory <br />oversight or managing authority. Liabilities from such entities retroactively applied <br />to each member agency could constitute a gift of public funds to an individual(s) <br />and/or public entity. <br /> <br />· Gives Retirement Agency Authority to Increase the Amount Owed Through <br />Assumption Changes and/or Investment Losses: <br />Retirement obligations are unlike other forms of traditional debts and liabilities. <br />Unfunded retirement liabilities are particularly volatile and can grow to <br />insurmountable costs based on no fault of the agencies who contract with a <br />retirement system for health and pension benefits. It is estimated that in FY <br />9.A. - Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.