My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-01-08 Adj Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-01-08 Adj Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:41:49 PM
Creation date
3/12/2002 9:49:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
1/8/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The department was contacted and is responsible for the maintenance of the parking <br /> structure. The costs were actually those used for the parking structure on Marshall <br /> Street. City Manager clarified that the $1,500.00 per year is for elevator maintenance <br /> only and $42,000.00 for other maintenance. Roberta Mundie, of Mundie and <br /> Associates, reported the costs are actually estimated much higher at approximately <br /> $200,000.00 per year. <br /> <br /> Joe Syufy, Century Theatres, responded to the following question. <br /> <br /> 25. A request to break out the demographics into age groups was requested. <br /> <br /> Mr. Syufy apologized stating that data of that nature is not collected. The only data <br /> collected pertains to ticket prices, that being how many child, adult or senior tickets are <br /> sold. Hie stated 5-6% of tickets sold are to children (12 and under), the same to seniors <br /> and the balance to adults. Bargain matinees are not included because the ticket prices <br /> are all the same. <br /> <br /> Tim Kelly, of Keyser Marston Associates, responded to one comment. <br /> <br /> 26. The City is giving land to the developer in exchange for a garage estimated to cost <br /> $20,000,000.00, which will generate revenue of $220,100.00 a year. This is slightly <br /> better than a 1% return on investment per year to the City, hardly a good deal. <br /> <br /> He stated the comment is not based upon a correct interpretation of the proposed <br /> agreement which is that the $20,000,000.00 is not a City or Agency expense. It is an <br /> expense being funded by the private developer; however, the City/Agency will own the <br /> garage. The cost to the Agency to get the $20,000,000.00 from the developer is that of <br /> conveying two parcels of substantially less value, approximately one quarter less of the <br /> value. The cost to the Agency is substantially less than $20,000,000.00. The return to <br /> the Agency, the $220,000.00, is partly reflective of the City's policy towards parking <br /> charges. <br /> <br /> Roberta Mundie, Mundie and Associates, the consultant that prepared the economic report <br /> lbr the retail/cinema proposal responded to the following questions. <br /> <br /> 27. The continuing success of the other cinema projects studied in the economic <br /> report was questioned. <br /> <br /> The economic report discusses the number of cinema projects in other communities' <br /> downtowns and reviews their record. As the report mentions, the original research for <br /> those reviews was undertaken some time ago, but this thli was updated again with staff <br /> and/or project representatives in each one of the cities of Berkeley, Oakland, Concord, <br /> <br />JOINT ADJOURNED REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 8, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 12 <br /> MINUTES Book No.58 <br /> Page NO. 308 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.