Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment I <br /> <br />,C' <br /> <br />General Fund Hiahliahts <br /> <br />Revenues <br />Total general fund revenues were $70 million, or 7.62%, over FY 2004/05 actual revenues <br />of $65 million and $4 million, or 6.17%, above the budgeted revenues of $66 million for FY <br />2004/05. The increase over the prior year is primarily attributable to increased rebates <br />from San Mateo County for prior year payments to the Education Revenue Augmentation <br />Fund (ERAF). The general fund received a payment of $2.5 million from the County as its <br />share of the ERAF rebate. Additional factors contributing to the increase in general fund <br />revenues are higher property taxes of $1.1 million due to increased assessed valuation, <br />increased vehicle license fee (VLF) tax of $1.1 million is due to the re-instatement of the <br />VLF backfill in FY 2004/05 after receiving only eight months of this revenue in FY 2003/04, <br />increased sales taxes and other taxes of $0.7 million. The revenue highlights for FY <br />2004/05 are: <br /> <br />. Property taxes (excluding supplemental taxes and prior years taxes) increased 5.5%, or <br />$1.1 million from $20.4 million to $21.5 million; <br />. Sales taxes increased 4.65%, or $0.7 million from $15.7 million to $16.4 million mostly <br />due to new vehicles sales and increased gas prices at the gas stations. <br />. Transient occupancy revenues increased 21.1 %, or by $0.4 million from $1.8 million to <br />$2.2 million. This is due to the voter-approved increase in the transient occupancy tax <br />rate from 8% to 10% in December 2003 (in effect for the full year in FY 2004/05) and <br />increased occupancy; <br />. Utility users tax revenue increased 2.25%, or $0.2 million from $7.5 million to $7.7 <br />million. <br />. Vehicle license fee (VLF) tax increased 31 %, or $1.1 million from $3.5 million to $4.6 <br />million due to the re-instatement of the VLF backfill from the state in FY 04/05. The <br />State backfill was suspended for four months in FY 2003/04. <br />. ERAF rebate of $2.5 million ($1.5 million attributed to FY 2003/04 and $1 million <br />attributed to FY 2004/05) compared to $1.2 million received in FY 2003/04. <br /> <br />The City continues to rely very heavily upon property and sales taxes (exclusive of <br />proposition 172 sales tax revenue) as almost 55% of the general fund revenue is derived <br />from these two sources. Sales taxes provided 24% of general fund revenue while property <br />taxes accounted for 31 % of general fund revenue. <br /> <br />Expenditures <br />Total general fund expenditures for FY 2004/05 were $63.5 million. This was $3.5 million or <br />5.85% over the amount expended in FY 2003/04. <br /> <br />Employee costs continue to represent the highest single source of expenditures accounting <br />for 73% of all general fund expenditures. <br /> <br />2 <br />